One of the main differences of interpretation between Charles Beard and Carol Berkin is their point of view on the Constitution and the founding fathers.
Charles Beard is the author of An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. In this work published in 1913, the author argued that the Constitution of the United States was formulated to serve the interests of wealthy members of the upper class of society.
One of his most controversial statements is his claim about the Founding Fathers, whom he points out as belonging to the upper-class group and who wrote the Constitution to defend their rights and interests.
On the other hand, Carol Berkin is the author of the book The Bill of Rights: The Fight to Secure America's Liberties, published in 2015. In this book, she exposes her interpretation of the process of creation of the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Rights.
Her interpretation of these historical events is framed in a vision of the founding fathers as mere mortals who ignored the possibility that the new government they were building would last for many years.
Based on the above, it can be inferred that Carol Berkin and Charles Beard have different views of the Constitution and the founding fathers such as:
- Charles considers that they wrote the constitution for their convenience.
- Carol describes them as ordinary people who wanted to change their situation and establish a government for all.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1992478
Answer:
Any possible factor, as long as the product matches their time of need and how necessary the product is needed. Anything that could be a beneficial improvement or a solution to a problem that affects everyone around you.
Explanation: Take, for example, face masks and protection. Everyone is required to wear masks and stay distanced and clean. That is what companies are doing and promoting. They're making themselves known by making a difference and helping people to make themselves have a positive image. The Pandemic has changed everyone's lives, so those masks are going to be sold out fast. Anything that could help or protect anyone in a situation like this will be needed.
Answer:
In February 1788, she published a 19-page pamphlet called “Observations on the New Constitution, and on the Federal and State Conventions.” She argued that the Constitution as it stood proposed, not yet with a Bill of Rights, threatened to violate individuals' and states' rights
Explanation:
He reoccupied the Rhineland (demilitarized zone), he also rebuilt his army and his air-force but that was around the time when the disarmament conference failed so he used that as his excuse to rearm (other countries were doing the same).
<span>I think this was in 1939 but he also had a political union with Austria which he wasn't allowed to do. </span>
<span>The allies did not do anything to prevent him from breaking the terms of the treaty as many people saw that it was too harsh on the germans so there was no point in protecting it.
</span>This was not copied from a website or someone else.
