Answer:
C) Company 1 sold their bonds at 94 and redeemed them at 106.
Explanation:
The face value of bond issued in 4 companies are same, then it's clearly that the company 1 will have the lowest carrying value on their bonds because they sold at lowest price but buy back (redeem) at highest prices.
The two days Lauren doesn't receive pay would be $150 × 2 = $300
Add on the cost of transportation & lodging: $300 + $250 = $550
Finally, add the cost of the concert ticket: $550 + $50 = $600
The opportunity cost of Lauren's decision to attend the concert is $600.
<u>Answer:</u>
<u><em>Laws passed by the federal government often provide benefits for a small number of individuals. These individuals, in turn, have an incentive to contribute to the campaigns of politicians who pass these laws</em></u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
When individuals or firms cunningly try to get benefits from government at the detriment of others it term rent seeking.
Implying they seek shelter under this laws that benefit them the most.
For example, certain tax laws may favor the weather citizens of a country and they (the wealthier citizens) may take advantage of that.
Financial, operational, perimeter, and strategic risks.
Like costs, labor, and weather.
Answer: Company should not expand to either.
Explanation:
Find the expected values of expanding to either country and pick the country with the highest expected value:
China:
= ∑(Probability of outcome * Outcome)
= (20% * 2,000,000) + (30% * 1,000,000) + (50% * -2,000,000)
= -$300,000
Vietnam:
= (70% * 1,000,000) + (30% * -2,500,000)
= -$50,000
<em>Both countries result in an expected loss so company should not expand to either of them. </em>
