Answer:
P-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject null hypothesis.
Explanation:
Here,
Sample size = n = 120
Sample proportion = p = 0.6500
Population Proportion =
= 0.5
Level of significance = α = 0.02
<u />
<u>Step 1:
</u>
: p = 0.5
: p < 0.5 (Left tailed test)
<u></u>
<u>Step 2:
</u>
The critical vale is = 2.0537
<u></u>
<u>Step 3: </u>
The test statistic is,
z = 
<u>Step 5:
</u>
Conclusion using critical value: Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value, we fail to reject null hypothesis.
<u>Step 6: </u>
Conclusion using P-value: Since the P-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
<span>One part of Henry Clay's proposed American system to bring about economic improvement included support for a high tariff, the intent of which was to protect American industries while also generating revenue for the federal government.</span>
Answer:
$35,000
Explanation:
Requirement: Prepare the Operating Activities section of the Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended 2004. Use the INDIRECT Method
Cash from Operating Activities
Particulars Amount$
Net income 6000
Add: Depreciation expense <u>50000</u>
Operating Cash Flow before 56000
Change in Working Capital
Add:
Decrease in inventory 3000
Increase in incomes taxes payable 7000 <u>10000</u>
Less:
Increase in accounts receivable 10000
Increase in prepaid Rent 8000
Decrease in accounts payable 7000
Decrease in salaries payable 6000 <u>-31000</u>
Cash from Operating Activities <u>$35000</u>
Answer:
B. The Sherman Act allows the US government to regulate activities that restrain competition and trade
Explanation:
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was first legislation enacted by US congress. It was brought into force to regulate competition and trade among enterprises. This act prohibits agreement in restraint of trade or interference of power in trade like price fixing, bid rigging, etc.
The Sherman Act did not work for long as it restrict the business merger and people are confused about knowing the motive of the act as it is not designed properly.