Answer:
I'm going with B
Explanation:
It can't be A because the war took place in America and that is not the Brits home turf and can't be C because the natives almost definitely didn't like the brits. I'm not sure on D but B seems more likely over that.
Answer:
there is no ix in that word
Basically to protect the rights of the people
Answer:
The President has used his role as commander-in-chief to initiate military actions, but not war.
Explanation:
The difference between a military action or intervention and war is diffuse and subject of debate among constitutional scholars. It seems that if the president sends military abroad without approval of Congress, then, it is a military intervention, and if the president does the same with approval of Congress (as it happened in World War II, the last time Congress declared war), then, it is war.
Therefore, the Korean, Vietnam, Iraq, and most recently, Libya and Syria interventions are not legally considered war, but military interventions.
Well I’m not going to write an entire essay for you, but here are some points that might help. I would encourage you to write about how you would join the war.
Consider that those who don’t join the war will be looked upon unfavourably by most, especially allies they swore to help. Essentially, you would be treated poorly at post-war negotiations.
Also consider the nationalist fervour present among the populous in most European states. People were rather excited for war in many cases, with many believing the war would be over by the Christmas of 1914. Not many knew the true horror of what would transpire during the war, and those who did didn’t make it known to the civilian population whose support they relied upon. Finally, bring up how Belgium declared neutrality but was still invaded by the German army.