A.
In the winter, the town is filled with skiers who come for the beautiful Rocky Mountains
Answer: I believe it is this argument appeals to the wheelchair ethos of the wealthy upper middle class American slob
Explanation:
The correct answer is 3. The bee's wool has a misleading name.
Explanation:
The paragraph about bee's wool beetles focuses on explaining why the name of this insect is not appropriate. This is supported through details such as "It has no direct, lasting connection with bees" or "t does not sip nectar" because these details explain this insect is not related to bees or even similar to these. In this context, the main idea or message of this paragraph is to explain how the name of the insect is misleading, and to do this, the author adds very precise reasons or evidence.
That's a weird question. It could be any if the above, and without more context it's impossible to know. The most general one that applies to pretty much all claims is "it takes a clear position", so I would go with that.
Yes, life is worth living if we are content with what we have. If one is not content or grateful for what we have then we will not like life. On the other hand, though, if one is content and happy with what we have then life will be worth living. If we are happy with what we have then life would be an amazing experience and we will want to live it.
