Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
The assignment wants a personal answer about your view of the headmaster's work and sport at your school. In that case, I can't write your answer, but I'll help you do that.
<h3>Response structure</h3>
- Show the changes that have taken place in the school in relation to sport.
- Emphasize whether these changes were beneficial or harmful.
- Show how the school headmaster was one of those responsible for the change.
- Point out how the director worked to bring about these changes.
This answer will depend on your analysis of your school and how the sport is established in it. You can talk to students and staff to strengthen this analysis.
Learn more about sports at the link:
brainly.com/question/1744272
#SPJ1
The upper class only had chocolate
That’s alottttttttttttttt
