1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OverLord2011 [107]
4 years ago
14

In "Life without Principle," Thoreau writes, "If my wants should be much increased, the labor required to supply them would beco

me a drudgery." What does this statement mean?
Social Studies
1 answer:
olga_2 [115]4 years ago
3 0
This statement means that if he wants to accomplish something you got to work hard and try your hard to earn what you want. So try your hardest and you can accomplish whatever you want  <span />
You might be interested in
Which statement most accurately explains the result of the great compromise
igomit [66]

Answer:

settled a debate over representation in Congress.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Examples as potential or kinetic energy
statuscvo [17]
Taking a ball up 5 stories: gaining potential energy
Dropping the ball from 5 stories: gaining Kinetic energy
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An example of internalization of behaviors as a result of stress is
swat32
The answer is B. Irritability .
5 0
4 years ago
Psychologists are required to debrief subjects thoroughly after a research study when the study__________.
Semenov [28]
The correct answer that "deceives subjects about the true purpose of the research."
Sometimes, the subjects used in the research may encounter confusion due to the study, wherein what they find and discover throughout the process of the study may cause them to become confused of the true meaning and purpose of the study, which is why psychologists are required to debrief their subjects when they get tied up in these kind of events.
6 0
3 years ago
In schenck v. us (1919), the supreme court ruled that congress could ban certain types of speech in times of war if they constit
OLEGan [10]

In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that criticism of the draft was NOT protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to American interests.

  • In the Schenk v. US case, which concerns the freedom of speech issue, Schenk urged Americans to forgo the World War I draft.
  • The Supreme Court concluded in Schenck v. the United States that the First Amendment did not apply to criticism of the draft because it posed a clear and present danger to American interests.
  • The U.S. Supreme Court heard a First Amendment challenge to federal legislation on free speech grounds for the first time in this case.

Learn about more Supreme Court here

brainly.com/question/18228641

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Who did Bartolome de Las Casas want to use as labor in the Spanish colonies?
    11·1 answer
  • HELPPP ASAP!!!!! 20 POINTS
    11·1 answer
  • A poll showed that voters prefer to have members of Congress vote as delegates. This information probably influences representat
    13·1 answer
  • Which production by England's Punchdrunk company was a breakout hit of the 2011-12 season in New York and is considered the lead
    13·1 answer
  • The fertile crescent is located in _____?<br><br> the middle east<br> India<br> Africa<br> china
    15·1 answer
  • In what ways is share cropping similar to slavery?
    15·2 answers
  • What drives a market economy?
    6·2 answers
  • How did the Persian Wars change the relationship between Athens and Sparta?
    7·1 answer
  • what may be the reason of less corruption in the developed countries and high corruption in developing countries ?​
    7·1 answer
  • Symbolic interaction is a form of interaction where interactionists focus on how people use symbols when interacting. Please sel
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!