D allowing hundreds of thousands of jews refugee in there country
I think your answer should be either the third choice or second choice. They both make sense to me but the other two are definitely not it. Hope this helps! =^-^=
<span>Compare U.S. Presidents: William Henry Harrison vs John Tyler. View the presidents' foreign and domestic accomplishments, political backgrounds, and more.</span>
Unitary form of government would avoid this characteristic.
Option: A
Explanation:
Unitary form of government is the system of government which have the supreme power over the every branches of administration means executive, judiciary etc. It finalize the decision of its subordinate classes of governments. Here laws for crimes do not differ from state to state.
In confederate, presidential, parliamentary system of government each branches are assigned with its own duty and it has no power on the decision of other branches. So the decision may vary from state to state. Senate and house of representatives take decision separately for every political feature.
He changed England in a lot of ways, but I would probably say the Feudal system is one of the most dramatic changes. This would have impacted the people of England as the more poor became pedants at the lowest rank in society, being controlled by those above them. The majority of England weren’t
rich, and most of the higher rankings were Williams own people. - hope this helps a bit
