Answer:
Yes. But only on the land that wasn't pre-occupied by the native.
Explanation:
The vast majority of the land in North America at the time was inhabited. Coming to this territory to form farms and towns would not bother any particularly group of people.
The creation for farms and towns itself wasn't immoral.
But, doing so while taking the ancestral land of the locals and forced them to moved away or kill them is considered as 'immoral'. There were plenty of space that hey can occupied without doing so.
The slavery was a peculiar institution because the slaves used to show in the market as goods where they presented a pen or non-living things in the row.
Explanation:
The expansion and high demand of cotton increased the demand of labor. These workers (salves) were not paid by their owners. Their owners used them as a commodity and not as human being. They used to work for long working hours without any leave or other facility at the work place.
There's multiple differences in the government systems in the countries of Jordan and Kuwait on one side, and the United Arab Emirates and Oman on the other side.
Jordan and Kuwait are both countries that have parliamentary monarchies. They have a Prime Minister that is the head of the country, and also there's a multiparty system, so the people can vote for their leader.
The United Arab Emirates and Oman, on the other hand, are countries that have constitutional monarchies. The monarch is leading the country, and it is not the people that have their say in the choice by voting, instead, it is the only the high class representatives of the society that vote for who will lead the country.
Answer: Stockyard
Explanation: Good luck! :D
