Answer:
Answer 1.
Beneath referenced pointers show that organization arranged the liquidation for recent years or something like that.
- The way that there had been no interest in R&D for recent years which more likely than not brought about noteworthy cost putting something aside for the organization.
- BBB bought expanded size of stock on layaway from providers in recent years which is a warning.
- Indeed, even without bringing about any R&D cost for recent years, CFO of BBB moved toward the bank to expand the credit line of the organization and utilized all credit line without legitimate desk work.
- CFO erroneously guaranteed the brokers about new product offering so as to look for advances/increment credit line.
- Indeed, even with diminished deals, organization was indicating lower supply of stock. They more likely than not been offering the stock at cost to outsider or shrouded it at an undisclosed area to dupe the providers.
- With no interest in R&D and declining business possibilities, organization couldn't have given new offers for subsidizing
Answer 2.
Yes, even if it is a fraudulent filing for bankruptcy, BBB organization despite everything can select to petition for financial protection or BBB can close the business through and through and escape with the reserve funds and continues from the offer of the stock. Indeed, even leasers and providers reserve the option to petition for automatic insolvency against the BBB in the event that BBB doesn't seek financial protection.
It thoroughly relies upon the BBB Company, in the event that it selects to declare financial insolvency under section 7, or 11 of the liquidation code. Be that as it may, it is just under section 11 liquidation procedures of the chapter 11 court it very well may be set up that BBB's aim and untrustworthy strategic policies establishes to insolvency misrepresentation.
Answer:
Hammer would prevail against Kay based on:_______.
A. Unilateral contract.
Explanation:
A unilateral contract is a contract created by an offer that can only be accepted by performance. To form the contract, the party making the offer (called the “offeror”) makes a promise in exchange for the act of performance by the other party.
in relation to the case in the contract, Hammer had carried out the duties expected of him thus making the contract valid under a unilateral contract.
since in a unilateral contract, the offer can only be accepted when the other party completely performs the requested action.
Hence Hammer would prevail against Kay based on Unilateral contract.
Answer:
B) $4.67
Explanation:
By definition marginal revenue is the revenue generated by the sale of one more unit of product Z.
Marginal revenue = unit price
Since firm X participates in a perfectly competitive market, it is a price taker, and since the marginal revenue is constant, we can assume that this is the equilibrium price of product Z.
<u>Answer:</u>
Fatima's statement that she intends to continue in her job in spite of her dissatisfaction makes you think that Fatima will likely experience "Cognitive Dissonance".
<u>Explanation:</u>
Cognitive dissonance is a psychological concept when an individual experiences non consistent thoughts and emotions (regardless of the environment). In this example, Fatima had been expected to quit her job (because she hated the manager).
In spite of that, she continued to work. That caused the cognitive dissonance in her behavior, as she changed her attitude. People correlate decisions and feelings many times, but due to some factors like patience, need of job etc, worked for an individual to be consistent and continue job.
Answer:
Pretty sure its a I am not sure however
Explanation: