Answer:
Storming of the Bastille (July 14, 1789) The Bastille is a French prison which is located in Paris, France. On the afternoon of the 14th of July 1789 the Bastille was stormed by an angry and aggressive mob. The Bastille in during the French Revolution was a symbol of power and the monarchy's dictatorial rule.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Guarantee of livelihoods, support and protection is the “positive good” argument of George Fitzhugh.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
George Fitzhugh was an American social theoretician who released sociological theories based on skin colour and forced labour in the antebellum period. He contended that black "is just an adult child" who requires the economic and social security of slavery.
Fitzhugh continued to argue that slavery was based on faith and that capitalism converted people into slaves for capitalism. There are cannibalistic among capitalists. In the field, Fitzhugh defended slavery not just for African descendants.
He ended with a positive and good comment. Fitzhugh claimed that Southern Slaves had a "freedom, support and protection assurance," and he argued he might be forced to give up his enslaved to a more qualified slaveholder if an owner could not perform his welfare responsibilities.
Answer:
Correct answer is C. three-pronged attack.
Explanation:
C is the correct answer because Allies had to attack Germany first of all from all sides. That is why Operation Overlord was put into motion. Anglo-American forces were to attack the German forces on the shores of Normandy while in the same other Allied forces, first of all Soviet will push forward from east and south. Eventually, this led to collapse of Axis Power.
Therefore, all other options are not correct as they were not sufficient.
Answer:
Rosa Luxemburg wrote in The Junius Pamphlet (1915) that the Social Democrats across Europe failed to block their nation's governments because they were docile and showed weakness, there was a waning of their fighting spirit.
Explanation:
Rosa Luxemburg (1871-1919), a prominent Marxist intellectual in Germany said that the Social Democrats failed to stop the governments of Europe from going to war, especially because the Marxist leaders had lost their fighting spirit (Luxemburg, Julius Pamphlet, 1915). The consequence is that the bourgeois state and the dominant classes were able to maintain their control of the state and institutions at the expense of the people of Europe who had to endure the war. Luxemburg said the European Left should see the war as a test of strength and that the Social Democrats need to learn how to be protagonists instead of a "will-less football," (Chapter 1, The Julius Pamphlet). Luxemburg believed the party needed to take control of their own fate and history if their view of society was to prevail. It is known through other speeches and writing that Luxemburg believed the Social Democrats had become overly bureaucratized and the trade unions in Germany resisted the idea of revolution.
