All categories

3 years ago

Which is an example of the presidential power that has no clear limitation

History

2 answers:

Alika [10]3 years ago

7 0

The power to grant pardon is an example of Presidential power with no limitations in United States.

Further Explanations:

The President is considered to be the chief of the government of United States .He also administers the Federal government and also resides the post of Commander in chief of Armed Forces. He bears the responsibility of the most expensive armed force having second largest nuclear arsenal. He also holds some remarkable domestic and international power.

Among all the powers of the President he also possess the power to grant pardon provided to him under Article II, section 2 of the constitution of United States. The power allows him to pardon a person off his guilt as if he never committed that sin. Limitation to power is only on the convictions under Federal Laws. The power to grant pardon is also not effective in case of Impeachment.

Learn more

1. Which of the following represents one of congress's electoral powers?brainly.com/question/1907649

2. Which country was the last to join the allied powers?brainly.com/question/8975931

Answer Details:

Grade: High school

Subject: US History

Chapter: Presidential Power

Keywords: President, Commander, Armed forces, domestic, international, Article II, section, United States, pardon, convictions, Federal Laws, Impeachment,administers, expensive,sin

Naily [24]3 years ago

5 0

In the United States constitution, granting pardons is an example of a presidential power that has no clear limitation.

FURTHER EXPLANATION

One of the least powers granted to the president by the constitution is the power to pardon. Though the constitution makes some limitation to the powers and the only limitations is that powers are limited to offences against the country. The constitution addressed it further that the power given to the president to pardon cannot in any way affect an impeachment process.

The power of a president to pardon does not affect the legal guilt of a person instead it only remove the legal effect of a conviction.

A person may be pardoned after committing an offence and pardon can also be granted after a complete sentence is served. Nevertheless, the president cannot issue a pardon when an offense has not been committed.

The power given to the president of the United States to pardon was obtained from the royal English prerogative of kings after the attack by Normans. During this era, the king granted pardon in return for military service or money, though the parliament tried to strip the king of this power, but it was not successful until 1701 when it passed the settlement ACT. The Settlement ACT removed the royal power to pardon in the case of impeachment.

LEARN MORE:

example of a presidential power brainly.com/question/1794184

KEYWORDS:

constitution
power to pardon

You might be interested in

During World War II, Germany was a member of the Allies. Axis. United Nations. League of Nations.

ivolga24 [154]

The correct answer is: "Axis"

The axis powers were formed by Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and the empire of Japan in the Pacific front. These powers fought jointly against the Allies in WWII, that were constituted by France, UK, United Stated and the URSS (from 1941 onwards). The axis emerged during the German and Italian territorial expansions that took place before the war.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the government raise money during Revolutionary United States

amm1812

The U.S. debt in 1783 totaled $43 million. That year, Congress was given the power to raise taxes to cover the Government's costs. ... To help raise money, federal bonds were issued by the Government. 1775 - Paying for the American Revolutionary War was the start of the country's debt

4 0

3 years ago

How does the separation of powers between the three branches of government lead to balance in power

rewona [7]

No branch can make a decision without approval.

Hope I could help you. :)

Sincerely, Ben

6 0

3 years ago

Europeans were looking for sea routes to Asia in the fifteenth century. The primary motivation for this was to ___________.

lana [24]

to get access to Asian goods such as silk and spices

hope this helps

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The line-item veto challenges the notion of A) senatorial courtesy B) congressional oversight C) federalism D) executive privile

Alex777 [14]

Answer: E) separation of powers

Explanation:

The Line-item veto is a provision that allows an Executive authority such as a Governor or the President to cancel out parts of a bill enacted by Congress without having to veto the whole thing. Essentially it is a partial veto power that allows them to veto a bill only in part should they please.

Governors in 45 US States have this right but the President of the United States does not.

It is argued that this provision violates the principle of Separation of Powers amongst the Judiciary, the Legislature and the Executive.

This is because the Legislature should have exclusive power to construct the inner texts of a bill and the Executive should not be able to alter this content.

6 0

3 years ago