The statement that identifies the central idea of the text is that the exact cause and events of the Wounded Knee massacre depend on who you talk to.
The text deals mainly with the Indian wars, a term generally used to refer to a set of conflicts in which fought
- The United States government
- The government of Canada
- White settlers
- Native populace
Given the wide participation of different groups in this conflict, different perspectives of this problem can be had. In the text, accounts of different participants in this conflict are taken so that the reader can interpret the information and form their vision of this conflict and the final event that was the Wounded Knee massacre.
Based on the foregoing, it can be inferred that the central theme of this text is that the exact cause and events of the Wounded Knee massacre depend on who you speak with because it includes accounts from different individuals who contribute their vision of the event.
Note: This question is incomplete because the text is missing. However, the text can easily be found on the internet under the title of The Wounded Knee Massacre By Digital History (2016)
Learn more about Civil War in: brainly.com/question/971446
Money/cash would lose integrity if no gold was there and back up our currency value and I don't like how this website says someone will answer you question in 10min but I seen that u waited more time and I understand your patience
Answer:
b. Restrict first amendment rights.
Explanation:
The Schenck v. United States (1919) Supreme Court case ruled by putting limitations on the rights of individuals if it concerns the interest of the nation. This ruling states that constitutional rights are not absolute and can be changed anytime the government sees fit.
The Supreme Court decided to issue the limits on the freedoms of individuals, especially during wartime. This ruling established the ability of the government in suppressing any speech or news that it thinks is harmful to the welfare of the nation. It stated that with concerns regarding the <em>"clear and present danger" </em>that can put the nation in jeopardy, the government is free to restrict the first amendment rights as and when it feels necessary.
Thus, the correct answer is option b.
