Answer:
The term that best describes this scenario is situational ethnicity.
Explanation:
A situational ethnicity is an ethnic identity that is particular to a social setting or context. It is an ethnic identity that is chosen for the moment based on the social setting or situation. Here one would choose to use one's ethnicity so as to use to one's advantage.
Answer: a. The McCain-Feingold Act violates freedom of speech.
Explanation:
Issue ads refer to a scenario where a candidate is named or discussed in relation to an issue without however, supporting or decampaigning an opponent.
This was restricted after the McCain-Feingold act of 2002. The Act restricted the use of Issue Ads within <em>30 days of a primary election or 60 days of a general election </em>for a person running for any Federal Office<em> </em>if the broadcast cost more than $10,000.
The Supreme Court ruled in its decision that unless the ad was expressly supporting or decampaigning a candidate, it should be exempted from the Act. The decision of the Court was also noteworthy as the Court declared it was against greater regulation of political speech.
A supporter of this Act would therefore probably seize upon this last part and say that the Act violates freedom of speech.
Answer:
Direct rule sends their own officials to rule, impose on the culture, and use the land for their own colonies. Indirect rule allows local rulers to decide on things, try to groom the kids to be like them, and did allow culture to stay (for the most part).
Explanation:
