All categories

3 years ago

Match the leaders to there goals at the paris peace conference

History

2 answers:

kozerog [31]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

President Woodrow Wilson of EEUU - Lasting peace and justice
Primer Minister Orlando of Italy - Territories promises earlier to his country
Primer Minister David Lloyd George of Britain - Money to rebuild his country
Primer Minister Clemenceau of France - Punishment for Germany

Explanation:

The Paris Peace Conference was the meeting in 1919 of the Allies after the armistice to agree the conditions of peace with the countries of the Central Powers: Germany, the Ottoman Empire, Bulgaria, Austria and Hungary, the latter two as representatives of the disappeared Austro-Hungarian Empire. The allies began their negotiation work with each other on January 18, 1919 under the direction of the Committee of Four: Wilson, Clemenceau, Lloyd George and Orlando, although those who really led the negotiations were the first three. The conquered countries was not allowed to attend these meetings, so they decided the future of the vanquished were the victors, who had different positions.

Positions of the allies

UK

• He had no territorial claims in Europe but aspired to win colonies in Africa and Asia.

• He wanted the destruction of the German naval fleet.

• I did not want to sink Germany so as not to strengthen France.

• He also asked for compensation.

U.S

• Creation of the League of Nations to guarantee the future peace of the world.

• Create new borders according to nationalities and compensation.

France

• Recovery of Alsace-Lorraine.

• Occupying the western part of the Rhine militarily and creating an independent state in the Rhineland.

• Weaken militarily and definitely Germany. (Opposition to the union of Germany and Austria)

• Territorial earnings and compensation.

Kingdom of Italy

• Application of the Treaty of London: annexation of Trentino, Alto Adige, Trieste, Istria and Dalmatia.

• Colonial profits in the Middle East and Africa and war indemnities.

SVEN [57.7K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

I didn't find this one until after I had taken the test... Switch the two that are wrong, and the other person is exactly correct, in case anyone has some doubts (:

You might be interested in

If the President vetoes the national budget bills, the process starts again from the beginning. true or false

Arturiano [62]

I do not think so. so for me it is false.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Who were the first two people to walk on the moon

Mariulka [41]

Yuri gagarin hbdjbdj

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Best / right anser get's brailyest&10 pouint's

stealth61 [152]

It would be the Cold War between the US and the Soviet Union in which Reagan fought any progressive movements like the Sandinistas in NIcaragua by funding the contras and also he bombed Kaddafi in Libya by trying to make him out to be a tyrant when in fact it turns out that he transformed Libya into one of the most modern and progressive countries in Africa under him.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Heavy Elements make up:

sveticcg [70]

Answer:

The bulk of nebulae

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What were the effects of the civil War? (200 words minimum)

White raven [17]

Answer:Later in the same year, in 1862, Lincoln approached the removed states, asking them to return the Association or have their slaves declared free. On January 1, 1863, when no state yet returned, he proclaimed the Liberation Announcement. The proclamation offered moral support to the North while preventing European countries from supporting the South. It also had the actual effect of allowing the enrollment of African Americans for the Armed Forces of the Association Although a series of early Confederate successes, the Association powers eventually prevailed in the war. Because of Lincoln's diplomacy, the North's victory was incomplete, despite its overwhelming powers and technology and monetary assets. By 1864, he had turned himself into a brilliant political and military pioneer. The enormous setbacks of Researchers and military historians have never stopped being puzzled with what occurred from both sides during the American Common Conflict. The conflict claimed the lives of about 2% of the US population in 1860. The conflict itself is remembered as the bloodiest in the history of the United States.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago