1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
4 years ago
8

Who were the two sides in the French Indian war and who were the allies of each

History
1 answer:
rewona [7]4 years ago
4 0

The two sides in this war were the French and the Indians. And if I remember correctly the Huron Indians were allied with the French. While the British were allied with the Indians.

You might be interested in
Safavid shahs did all of the following EXCEPT a. follow Roman laws. b. be more available to their subjects. c. seize landed esta
Hunter-Best [27]
Safavid shahs claimed to be family descendants from the prophet Muhammad. They were more available to their subjects, seized landed estates and appointed officials based on merit. They did not follow Roman laws. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5 points
Brilliant_brown [7]
Rio grandma give me my 5 points
5 0
3 years ago
Which event marked the end of the Western Roman Empire? The Greek city Byzantium was renamed Constantinople.
nekit [7.7K]

Answer:

The Germanic leader Odoacer seize control of Rome.

Explanation:

The deposition of the Western emperor Romulus Augustulus by the Germanic leader Odoacer is usually seen as marking the end of the Western Roman Empire. Odoacer belonged to the "barbarians," as were known by the Romans. However, his actual ethnicity is unclear. After his conquest of Rome, he was considered King of Italy. He was also able to gain the suppport of the Senate, which allowed him to make major changes to the administrative system of Italy.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one result of the War of 1812?
Ganezh [65]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

The war of 1812 brought the states together to work toward a common cause.

3 0
2 years ago
Do you think that the permission granted by Mughal Emperor Jahangir to the English East India Company on trade concessions and p
miskamm [114]

No, it was not a wrong decision because the aim behind this was to develop the country through increase in trade.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The decision granted by the Mughal emperor Jahangir to trade with the East India company was done with the intention to increase the trade of the country with East India company and then lead to the growth and development of the country.

With the increase of the trade, there would be more employment opportunities in the country and there would be more choices with the consumers to increase their standards of living their life.

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Mussolini use gangs of Fascist thugs in Italy?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a delay to statehood for the Washington statehood?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statements apply to the Middle Kingdom?
    14·1 answer
  • What effect did entrepreneurs have upon the Industrial Revolution?
    8·1 answer
  • Why was agriculture important to the development of civilization?
    13·1 answer
  • Thomas Jefferson goal was to
    10·1 answer
  • Please help!!! Why did settlers begin using the trail identified in this map?
    6·2 answers
  • I need help with question 9, and 10.
    9·1 answer
  • What goods were taken to China from Europe?
    12·1 answer
  • 11. The war gave rise to a new identity for African Americans, known as the “New
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!