Answer:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
b. Their unborn child is not likely to be benefited by eliminating only one risk factor.
c. The unborn child might have been benefited if prenatal care were found, but improving prenatal nutrition is not important.
d. The health care and stress factors will only be important after the child is born.
In this example, the social worker is not able to help Robert and Nadine with all their problems. The couple still needs to find work and prenatal care. However, the social worker was able to help them find enough food to eat. Although the baby still faces some risks, the fewer risks, the better. Therefore, he is still better off than he was before thanks to the limited help of the social worker.
The correct answer is (B) barometer
Answer: C) show only those costs that a manager can control.
Explanation:
Responsibility report is the accounting document that is provided to the management stages in an organization. This report shows all the amount of all the expense of the service and product along with extra added product and performance reports that is supervised and controlled by manager.
Other options are incorrect because general accounting guidelines, variable amount and preparation at top most level of manger is not followed by responsibility report.Thus, the correct option is option(c).
Answer: d. Physical depreciation
Explanation:
The allowance of the use of the second hand materials showed the materials met the standard required but this is subjective as the material life span has been shortened due to existing usage of the material.
<span>One of the major advantages of judges being appointed is that they are usually chosen on their basis of how well they have done their jobs, are they fair, have they done exceptional work in deciding their cases judgements. One of the disadvantages is that sometimes bad judges can slip thru the cracks when appointed that may not have the right moral compass to judge cases fairly. As such some judges can also be swayed to look the otherway on issues that they strongly oppose that their constituents may favor.</span>
