Answer:
Daniel Samper, en el escrito, está usando la ironía para hacer una crítica tanto de la conducta de la sociedad, como del estado.
Critica a la sociedad al resaltar como el 9 de abril, que empezó como una revuelta popular causada por el asesinato de Jorge Eliecer Gaitán, terminó con muchas personas saqueando establecimientos de comercio.
Critica al estado al resaltar que en Colombia, aún hay zonas a donde no llega la electricidad, por lo que personas que hurtaron electrodomésticos el 9 de abril, aún no han podido estrenarlos ya que no cuentan con servicio eléctrico.
Lincoln capitalized on the fact that a majority of the factories and rail lines were in the north which helped manufacture and distribute weapons and supplies to troops on the battlefront.
The answer is "All beliefs"
Answer:He was both, of course.
Explanation:He made Rome into the Empire it probably needed to be to continue to exist; the endless civil wars of the decades previous had not truly weakened the Republic’s borders, but they had resulted in Rome splitting into factions and substates repeatedly, and eventually if left unchecked this would have likely become permanent: there would have been several “Roman” states all bickering over the corpse of the Republic. So Augustus stabilized that situation, and created a system that would last well enough to endure the later civil wars, if barely, and last for five centuries.
But he also ruled completely and while following the forms of the Republic left no substance to them. Further, he made people enjoy that he was doing it, coercing and co-opting them into buying in to his new system. A long reign and massive personal will made this possible, but resulted in the end of much of what Rome had built up over the Republic. The idea that the Senate and People ruled the Empire persisted as a concept, given lip service, but it never re-emerged, and this was due to Augustus.
Tyrant and visionary, savior and destroyer, he was all of those things and much more.
