The author of the text that contains this quote appeals to the reader's sense of logic by quoting an authority/expert on the matter. Taking into consideration that expert's opinions, in argument, are as close to a fact as you can get without actually using a fact, this shows us how your best answer here is option B.
The independent clause is "WE ARE NOT EATING ON THE PATIO" the reason why, is because the second part of the sentence cannot stand on its own, due to the fact it has a because in it. because is a transition word.
What’s your favorite instrument?
Answer:
I belive technology is helping us
Everything in our everyday life is technology; cars, phones, computers, printers, manufacturers. Without these things and all of the other technology we use daily, we would be set back almost three hundred years
Without cars we would be stuck with no way to be productive in life. Unless you live right by your job of course. But no one could get to the factories, mines, and most of the essential jobs.
This evidence shows that we could not function without technology in our daily lives. If we can not get to our jobs, that industry would have no one to work for them. Creating 0 product or profit.
Explanation:
Sometimes there isn't a good answer. No matter how you try to rationalize the outcome, it doesn't make sense. And instead of an answer, you are simply left with a question. Why?
