Answer: The differences in the way in which the Native Americans and the European settlers were interacting with the environment are total contrasts.
The Native Americans lived in harmony with the environment. If they took down a tree for their needs, they were going to plant another one on that place. They hunted only enough for their basic needs and nothing more, plus were careful what they hunt, in which period of the year. They were not familiar with the minerals, so they were not doing any damage with mining. The European settlers, on the other hand, were taking down lot of timber and suing it for building, for melting ore, or for heating. They started to exploit the minerals in the regions, which led to mining, and to an inevitable pollution and destruction of those areas. They were over-hunting, without taking in consideration that they may eliminate some species. Started to build infrastructure, either in forested areas that were cleaned for that purpose, or on fertile land.
Explanation:
Answer:
He didn't. Washington didn't cut down a tree. A story of him cutting down an apple tree to illustrate his honesty, but it never actually happened.
MacArthur’s promise to return showed that the Americans live up to their commitment at any cost. Option B is correct.
<h2 /><h2>MacArthur:</h2>
- He was the chief of the American military during the 1930s and played an important role in WW II.
- When MacArthur left for a war against a strong Japanese military, President Roosevelt raise a concern about the shafty of MacArthur and his troop.
- MacArthur promised his president that he and his troops shall come and vowed, "I Shall Return."
Therefore, MacArthur’s promise to return showed that the Americans live up to their commitment at any cost.
Learn more about MacArthur:
brainly.com/question/3215668
Answer:
The social status of the mestizos changed with the development of the mullatos and emergence of other groups.
Explanation:
sorry that the answer is not that long
