Answer:
This is known as the nature-nuture controversy.
Explanation:
The answer is television and education. Reason is that public goods is a "good that is both non-excludable and non-rivalrous" (I quoted this, I did not plagarize XD)
Hope this Helped!
Plz mark brainliest!
Nate
Answer:
Anthony most likely concludes her speech in this manner because she hopes to <em><u>convince the audience that women are entitled to the same rights as men.</u></em>
Explanation:
It can be seen in this passage, Anthony was trying to protect women's right by implying that they are also citizens and their privileges and immunities should not be curtailed by any laws. And in the conclusion, she did also mention the term "discrimination against women" (refers to any actions that refuse opportunities, privileges to a person (or a group) because of gender as female) and express the objection to that to show the advocacy for women's right.
Taking a majority vote on something in class is an example of a direct democracy.