<h2><u><em>1 point: There is no hypothesis stated.
</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>1 point: In asking for volunteers, the teacher is taking a nonrandom sample that is probably not representative of the population of interest.
</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>1 point: Neither dreams nor nightmares are operationally defined, so they might be interpreted differently by later researchers.
</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>1 point: The research is not blind. The teacher could influence the results by the way he asked questions.
</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>(choose 2)</em></u></h2>
Answer and Explanation:
This means that a theory which leads to imposing moral standards universally without regard to people's historical and psychological differences are based off of subjectivism and lack any form of thorough investigation(normative science). This is self explanatory in the question where it says "...postulates moral truths enunciated by self-evident intuitions that are unchangeable". Moral standards such as this are mostly based on traditions that are subjective and are not given to transparency. This is opposed to when questions may be asked and investigations come into play as to why a particular moral opinion is taken enabling a society appreciate or understand a moral stance based on it's historical, cultural or psychological origins.
I think the correct answer among the choices listed above is option B. When the demand of a product is low, most likely the price of that product will go down. When the demand is low, most likely there is an excess supply which is referred as surplus. For businesses to have profit or to breakeven, they tend to lower the prices.
Not sure what this has to do with social studies, but as long as you had an adult over the age of 21 with a license in the car it would proceed like normal. If you didn't, which is illegal, you'd probably end up going to the police station, would no longer have a permit, and might not be able to get a license until you're 18-21. Don't do it please.
