<em><u>Magna Carta was a charter of Rights that that states the protection of church rights, baron from illegal imprisonment, justice and also limits the feudal payments to the crown.
</u></em>
Further Explanation:-
Magna Carta was known as the First Document which was imposed on the king of England and this document was made to limit the powers by law as well as protection of Civil Rights. Magna Carta was the document that was signed by King John in June 1215 and this document was the first document that brought limitations to the powers of the king. The clause 61 of this document stated that the committee which had twenty-five barons were given the right to meet and overrule the will of the King which posed a serious challenge to John’s authority as a monarch who was ruling the country. This charter was renounced as soon as when these twenty-five barons left London and the pope annulled the document and during the time of annulment of that document by pope, he said that this document impaired the authority of the church over the authority over the papal territories in regards to England and Ireland. Post that England moved towards the civil war as the barons were trying to replace the Monarch which they used to dislike as an alternative.
Learn more
1. Athens led a group of city-states following the?<u>brainly.com/question/903212
</u>
2. what feature did radio in the 1920s offer that other inventions did not offer? <u>brainly.com/question/963327</u>
3. how did the decision the supreme court reached in texas v. johnson affect the protections offered by the first amendment?<u>brainly.com/question/240143
</u>
<u>
</u>
Answer Details
Grade – High School
Subject – History
Chapter – Magna Carta
Keywords – Magna Carta, Document, Committee, London, Civil Rights, Limitations, Charter, Ruling, King John, Barons.
they lived together in poor conditions, and all family members worked on the farm
During the great Depression, migrant families were likely to find themselves living in dilapidated conditions and worked low jobs in the farms. They also faced hostility
Answer:
Sixty years ago, Allied political leaders and military commanders at the highest strategic levels fretfully considered the question of when the war in Europe would end and what that end would look like. Guessing would not be useful, and hopes could not be blind. The coming of the end of the war needed to be a matter of educated assessment, flexible planning and unprecedented coordination within government and the armed services.
Fortunately, Winston Spencer Churchill proved to be a master at meeting all of those demands. Britain’s prime minister had an uncanny ability to anticipate the course of events and to encourage or admonish as necessary. Above all, Churchill clearly foresaw the end of war in Europe. He showed such sound judgment, in fact, that one could say his predictions make a handsome bookend to his other, long-recognized predictions in the 1930s about the coming of the war. First as min-ister of defense and later as prime minister and a key member of a multinational coalition, Churchill masterfully managed the situation and never lost his faith in the war’s eventual outcome. He was also brilliantly adept at preparing his nation and its allies for the problems that they would face when peace finally did return.
Explanation:
