1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Crazy boy [7]
3 years ago
5

One long-term effect of the Crusades was the

History
1 answer:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
4 0
The correct answer is <span>(3) control of Jerusalem by Europeans

Jerusalem was in control by the Muslims from that area. When the first crusade was initiated it was done so to retake Jerusalem from the Muslims. The Europeans managed to do this and a long period of time passed before Muslims managed to reclaim it again for themselves. In the meantime, the Europeans had Jerusalem and tried to control the area.</span>
You might be interested in
Which country settled Australia?<br><br> Britain<br> France<br> United States<br> Russia
serg [7]
I have no idea but would u help me in my questions
6 0
3 years ago
20) What can you conclude about the purpose of Grady's speech? Question 20 options: He preferred the northern states. He thought
vitfil [10]
<span>C) He believed Georgia's economy was severely lacking.
hope this helped and please mark me as brainliest</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Why would citizens in the newly independent country of Latvia remove this statue of former Soviet leader Vladimir Lenin?
Rina8888 [55]
<span>Vladimir Lenin is the founder of Russian Communist Party.  In the year 2012, people demolished the statue of this leader because they considered it to be a symbol of Russian imperialism. The statues had suffered damages during protests and now need vital repairs. Lenin's support of democratic ideas was not welcomed by communist parties. Lenin's communist ideals were no longer supported by the people, and this was backed United Russian Party.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. Which of the following statements is not true regarding historians?
Bingel [31]

Answer:

It is not true that historians have the freedom to omit parts of evidence that they do not agree with.

Explanation:

Historians are academic professionals whose job is to collect events that occurred in the past, interpret them, and explain their development and consequences, including making connections between those events in the past and events in the present.

For this reason, historians cannot suppress content or events with which they do not agree, because if they did, they would be modifying the course of events and, therefore, reproducing an account of the events that would not coincide with reality.

7 0
3 years ago
What information does the first part of the story reveal about the social and economic contexts in which delia and sykes live? w
polet [3.4K]

what do eatonville and winter park represent?

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • At its essence history is an incredible
    12·1 answer
  • How does the free enterprise system differ from a mixed economy
    14·1 answer
  • How did the us government prepare americans for ww1?
    8·1 answer
  • Two strengths of the Continental Army included:
    8·1 answer
  • Why does MacArthur believe the United States should not back down from a war with China
    7·1 answer
  • How did geography influence how the Greeks lived
    8·1 answer
  • FDR’s presidental address is also known as the “ Infany Speech.” Originally, the the first line read , “ a date which will live
    9·1 answer
  • Based on the chart , which side of America Civil war had the least advantages ?
    9·2 answers
  • What was the earliest failure of the United Nations?
    9·2 answers
  • (Look at the pic)<br><br> Which of the following statements about Pom-<br> peii is true?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!