Hi! :)
Answer: A. They destroyed the South’s morale and captured its capital, forcing the South to surrender.
There were no specific routes, however, Sherman and Grant had targets and if they would be able to bring down their targets, it would be easier for them to take over.
They had destroyed many cities in the South so that they won’t be able to wage war because of the damages they had done in those cities.
Lots of trade including spices, and new technology/weapons.
I’m not sure if that’s what you want but that’s the basics of what comes and goes from countries.
Part of the debate over rights in the 18th century involved the prerogative of kings to remove and appoint judges upon their ascension to the throne. Liberal thinkers believed that lifetime appointments would scale back the power of the king, and therefore represented social progress. If a judge was sure of his seat, he could vote according to his own judgment, despite the wishes of the king. The Whigs in Britain actually won this right, though whether it really served their cause or their government is anyone's guess.
Answer: Egypt took development around the Nile River. Mesopotamia developed between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Both Egypt and Mesopotamia had governments. Those governments ran with one main ruler. Egypt had a centralized government with a Pharaoh, instead of a king like Mesopotamia. Both civilizations emerged around 3500 and 3000 BCE. Both civilizations shared differences and similarities between religion, culture etc.
Explanation:
You may keep researching or build and elaborate on what I have given you, cheers!
C c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c