The colonization period in Haiti was difficult, one of the hardest ones in all the Americas, the slavery was cataloged as the cruelest ever known, and the general live conditions for middle and lower classes were not good at all.
At the bottom of the social pyramid were the slaves, however the french soldiers had really hard duties on those times, they can be cataloged like <em>¨White slaves¨</em>, obviously they haven´t to perform the slave´s work, however duties turning around the slavery, extended shifts and dreadful life conditions made their work a difficult one.
So Haitian Slaves and French soldiers were technically in a similar spot, however, the slaves had survival and another kind of advantages over the French soldiers, a key point was the resistance or partial immunity to different diseases, unfortunately, that wasn´t the French´s case.
Yellow fever was a major issue to the French forces in Haiti, debilitated the army, and was one of the key points of the posterior events (the slavery and Haiti revolutions).
So definitely the two kinds of newcomers to Haiti, haven´t the same fate, the majority of slaves adapted quickly to new territory. the opposite happened to the French soldiers.
Thomas Jefferson and his party believed in an agrarian community. One in which the economy was dependent on crops, his views were that if the states provided crops like cotton to Britain then Britain in exchange would give them goods such as textiles. This worked for a period of time because England had just developed the cotton gin so they needed cotton in order to produce clothing.
Alexander Hamilton rather believed in a strong federal government dependent on industries. He thought the creation of a national debt would help the US because it would develop good credit with other nations which would give the US good standing to receive loans. Hamilton even founded the first national Bank of America. His view on government was more centralized then what Jeffersonians wanted. Jeffersonians were the ones who believed firmly in state rights and limited federal interference. This cause arguments between the two parties.
Answer:
Amendment I
Explanation:
Even though this is unlikely to happen, ammendment 1 would be the best choice because the first ammendment protects the right of the people to peacefully assemble so a lawyer could state that the police had no right to arrest or detain them because it is their constitutional right to protest peacefully.
Umayyad Caliphate spread east into Persia and west across North Africa Arab Muslims were put in the Capital of Arab Empire during Umayyad Dynasty.
