Answer: Thermoregulation and to ensure an increased Demand for energy in the form of ATP through cellular respiration.
Explanation: Thermoregulation is a processes through which the body of wen blooded animals such as Human trys to maintain a constant internal environment,the sweating and other body cooling mechanisms take place in order to ensure that excess heat is dissipated to the environment and allow for fresh air in the form of Oxygen to penetrate the body through cellular respiration.
Due to the stress involved in vigorous exercise, the body spends more of it's energy, and the need for more energy in the form of ATP will be needed to sustain the vigorous exercise by replacement of the energy lost.
Answer:
B. Cross-Sectional
Explanation:
A Cross-sectional study of design is a kind of design of observational study . In the cross-sectional study, an investigator measures or examines the outcome as well as the exposures in any study participants at the same time.
Cross-sectional design research includes using some different category of the people who differ in some variable of interest but they share few other characteristics, like educational background, socioeconomic status and ethnicity.
A Cross-sectional studies are mostly used by experimenters or researchers to study the developmental psychology in humans.
Thus in the context, the researcher using 50 participants to study the developmental changes in their choices to listen to music is a type of cross sectional research design.
Hence the correct option is (B).
Answer:
Idk
Explanation:
I don’t know that but what I do know is that cleopatra had a hand in the deaths of three of her siblings.
murder plots were as much a Ptolemaic tradition as family marriage, and Cleopatra and her brothers and sisters were no different. Her first sibling-husband, Ptolemy XIII, ran her out of Egypt after she tried to take sole possession of the throne, and the pair later faced off in a civil war. Cleopatra regained the upper hand by teaming with Julius Caesar, and Ptolemy drowned in the Nile River after being defeated in battle. Following the war, Cleopatra remarried to her younger brother Ptolemy XIV, but she is believed to have had him murdered in a bid to make her son her co-ruler. She also engineered the execution of her sister, Arsinoe, who she considered a rival to the throne.
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
It's 2 perceived differences between the parties
