Hi. You forgot to say that this question is about "Jimmy Carter’s Nobel Lecture". In addition, you forgot to enter the answer options. The options are:
A. To resolve violence and injustice throughout the world, nations needs to follow the terms put in place by international organizations who promote peace. B. Modern technology has allowed war to reach new heights of cruelty that can no longer be accepted. C. War is an unfortunate byproduct of human nature that society will never be able to be completely rid of. D. The only way that the United States can achieve peace is by avoiding involvement in other warring countries’ affairs. E. The growing power of the United States comes with a responsibility to maintain international peace and punish those who disrupt this peace. F. Because of its power and values, the United States has a responsibility to contribute to securing international peace, rather than engaging in war.
Answer:
A. To resolve violence and injustice throughout the world, nations needs to follow the terms put in place by international organizations who promote peace.
C. War is an unfortunate byproduct of human nature that society will never be able to be completely rid of.
Explanation:
Jimmy Carter was a pacifist and so it could not stop being his speech, when he went to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. In his speech he highlighted the importance of maintaining peace between countries, avoiding wars and conflicts that only cause destruction, pain and death.
In this text, he highlights the fact that in order to really promote peace in their territories, it is necessary that actions listen to and adopt the guidelines of organizations that are designed to promote peace, thus reducing violence and injustices in their territory.
It also reinforces the fact that war, in spite of only promoting sadness, is often a necessary evil. With this, he reinforces that war is an unfortunate by-product of human nature, which society will never be able to get rid of completely.
Mr. Wiesel chooses not to go with Maria, but gives his family the choice. Elie and his sisters choose not to be separated from their parents.
When thinking about Mr. Wiesel, his choice not be separated from his community is not surprising. Elie describes his father in the very beginning of the book as more attentive to the community than to his family. This choice to keep the family together is also referenced later in the book when the family is forced to separate after getting off the train.
When I think about my family, I think my parents wouldn't have given me the choice. My father would probably have smuggled us out with the first chance and not waited. While he is an optimistic person, he does not trust that everyone has goodness. If we had to make a choice like Eliezer did, I would not have wanted to be separated from my parents. I would've been too afraid to face the unknown without them.
Im not sure but i think it is b
Answer:
Lady Macbeth resists gender roles insofar as insulting her husband, emasculating him, and using hypothetical violence, however, this is also to inspire him to reach the position they feel he deserves; but she does not stray so far as to commit murder herself.
Explanation:
