Answer:
C. European nations wanted monopoly control of markets and resources
Explanation:
The nations of Europe didn't like the idea of completely free trade because it disagreed with the established monopoly they had over the market and trade with Africa and Asia. They wanted control over the goods and trade, and free trade would mean that is abolished.
<u>The other options are not true as the free trade was already a very known concept and the one that is very consistent with the capitalist theory. European nations also had plenty of goods to import from Africa and Asia, starting with materials like ivory and silk, to spices, food, etc. </u>
The Anti-Reforms of Alexander III had three main components:
1) Repression of political opponents and religious minorities
2) Undoing some of the reforms of his father
3) And to restore Russia's position internationally.
The purpose of Russification was to rid Russia of western, particularly liberal, ideas that Alexander believed had weakened Russia and compromised its national identity - he wanted to reclaim Russia’s Russian-ness. To achieve this, many liberals and foreigners were exiled, books were banned and political meetings broken up. There was a religious aspect of Russification: Orthodox Christians were favoured over other religions in many ways, especially in Imperial appointments, and the Orthodox Church had to preach obedience to the Tsar, as well as being made to inform the authorities if anyone confessed to anything seditious in confession (previously confession had been confidential between parishioner and priest).
One of the main political anti-reforms was the neutering of the Zemstvos, the rural councils. In 1889, the powers that the Zemstvos had were removed; local magistrates were also removed and replaced by people who were directly appointed and answerable to the Minister of the Interior.
The industrialisation of Russia, began under Alexander II, was meant to cement Russia's position as a Great Power, able to compete both militarily and commercially with France, Britain and Turkey.
Impact on the world. Very big impact and can't do less then 5
Answer: The answer you're looking for is C, major decisions were approved by an assembly
Brainliest Please
Answer:
When there's dispute among states with no other federal court to rule over it.
Explanation:
Original jurisdiction means the Supreme Court can hear a case that's come to it directly, without the matter having gone through rulings and appeals in a lower court. This can involve a dispute between states, with no other federal court having jurisdiction over the case. Those matters, however, are pretty rare.
One significant example is New Jersey v. New York, a case from the court's 1998 term. The Garden State sued the Empire State in the Supreme Court over jurisdiction of Ellis Island's artificially expanded landmass, an issue dating to the 19th century.
