Read the fine print, if it says “after signing, this contract is final.” Then Otto is screwed, because he must pay the $50,000
Or, Otto could hire a lawyer to fight it in court
Hope this helped ♥︎
Answer:
"$2,500" is the appropriate answer.
Explanation:
The question given seems to be incomplete. Below there is a attachment of full question is provided.
The given values are:
Plywood's price,
= $6 per sheet
Price falls,
= $4
Now,
At price $6, the consumer surplus will be:
= 
= 
= 
($)
When price falls, the consumer surplus will be:
= 
= 
= 
($)
Hence,
The increase in consumer surplus will be:
= 
= 
($)
Answer:
I'm going to use common sense and say A.
Explanation:
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
Answer:
negative consumption externality.
Explanation:
A negative externality arises when the production or consumption of a finished product or service has negative impact (cost) on a third party.
On the other hand, a positive externality arises when the production or consumption of a finished product or service has a significant impact or benefits to a third party that isn't directly involved in the transaction.
In this scenario, your neighbor enjoys seeing the grass in his yard grow wild and free, a practice with which you disagree because it poses a danger on the people around as snakes and other poisonous animals may breed or live there.
Hence, this is an example of a negative consumption externality because it's the potential of causing you harm or endangering your life.
