Answer:
you can try your frend to sand gift on mobile
Answer:
post an ad online
Explanation:
or flyers in your city work well to, my friend and i did that and we got a lot of offers
The capital projects fund account for the 10 percent retainage as (B) II only.
<h3>
What is retainage?</h3>
- Retainage is a percentage of the agreed-upon contract price withheld until the work is substantially completed to ensure that the contractor or subcontractor will fulfill its responsibilities and complete a construction project.
- Retention is money kept back by one party in a contract as security for unfinished or defective work.
- Assume the contract is worth $20,000 and you're submitting a paid app after finishing 25% of the work.
- So you earned $5,000 during the pay period, but retainage is 5%. The current progress payment has been reduced by $250.
- As a result, the "Amount Due for this Request" will be $4,750.
So, in the given situation the capital projects fund account for the 10 percent retainage as (II) the credit for $400,000 to Contracts Payable-Retained Percentage, that is (B) II only.
Therefore, the capital projects fund account for the 10 percent retainage as (B) II only.
Know more about retainage here:
brainly.com/question/24101126
#SPJ4
The correct question is given below:
The capital projects fund of Hood River completed the construction of an addition to its city hall at a cost of $4,000,000. The city council approved payment of the amount due to the general contractor, less a 10 percent retainage. How should the capital projects fund account for the 10 percent retainage?
I. As a credit of $400,000 to Deferred Revenue-Retained Percentage
II. As the credit for $400,000 to Contracts Payable-Retained Percentage.
A. I only
B. II only
C. Either I or II
D. Neither I nor II
Answer: The Contract is valid.
Explanation:
Under the UCC’s Statute of Frauds, transactions above $500 for goods cannot be made orally alone and have to be written in writing as well. This is the law that Rosenfield relied on.
However, Fallsview can argue that the Passover Retreat is not a Good, but rather a Service in which case it does not fall under the Statute.
The main bone of contention thereby becomes, if indeed it is a service or a good.
If it is a Hybrid of both, then the Court needs to decide if the services outweigh the goods involved.
From the text we see that the following were included in the package, food, entertainment, and lectures on religious subjects.
Food is the only good there and is outweighed by Entertainment and lectures on religious subjects.
As such, the contract is valid as it is for more service than good.