Definitions:
Rote: mechanical or habitual reputation of something to be learned
Tangible: perceptible by touch
Epistemology: the theory of knowledge especially with its regard to method, validity and scope. the investigation of what distinguishes justified belief from opinion
Inevitable: certain to happen, unavoidable
Stimuli: a thing that arouses activity or energy in someone or something; a spur or incentive
Profound: very great or intense
This is going to be a very short and minimal story.
Cecilia found comfort in peace and quiet. She enjoyed herself in the presence of others, and had a good time participating in profound conversations, yet the moments where she could get away seemed to make her a better person. Once she had discovered this, a pleasing stroll through the woods behind her house became inevitable at least once a week. She would let her mind wander, often pondering epistemology, and how much of a paradox thinking about thinking created. If she wasn't concerned with her thoughts, she would notice more tangible subjects of thought, like the ancient sequoias that surrounded her, or the wildlife among those mammoth trees. Cecilia often ended up near a particular fork in the trail, and her rote was to keep right. Today however, she ventured left in search of new stimuli to appease her ever-contemplating mind.
Haimon believes the authority rests with the people. :)
Brenda is likely classified as a popular child for being a good listener to friends, having control over her negative emotions and self-confidence,
<h3 /><h3>What are the characteristics of extroversion?</h3>
It is a personality dimension whose highlight is the individual's assertiveness and sociability, which are open to social interaction, more expressive and positive.
Therefore, an individual with a high degree of extraversion is likely to be popular and more self-confident in dealing with social situations.
Find out more about extroversion here:
brainly.com/question/7375078
The answer is <span>The supreme court is most likely to consider reviewing a case if </span><span>it raises a constitutional question
hope it helped </span>°ω°
