1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna71 [15]
3 years ago
9

Describe how Mexican Americans fought for equality and opportunity during the Progressive Era.

Social Studies
1 answer:
Alexandra [31]3 years ago
8 0

revolution

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Although most members of the faculty were strongly against the proposed new schedule, they did not voice their objections becaus
Dafna1 [17]

Based on the fact that the small group of dissenters did not voice their objections because well-liked members were in favor of the schedule, this is <u>Groupthink</u>.

<h3>What is groupthink?</h3>

This is a phenomenon where people in a group will pick choose a certain decision because they believe that most of the group supports that decision.

They do this even though they may have dissenting views, because they do not want to be left out.

Find out more on groupthink at brainly.com/question/10206116.

4 0
2 years ago
Jane is at the stage of her life in which she is interested in female friends and playing soccer. she also has taken interest in
fgiga [73]
I'd say she's in the latency stage
6 0
3 years ago
The difference between a strike team and a task force is:
JulsSmile [24]
Here is the answer that would best complete the statement above. The difference between a strike team and a task force is that, the <span>strike teams have similar resources while task forces are comprised of mixed resources. The answer for this would be option A. Hope this answers your question. Have a great day!</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Assess the role of artists as political activists
labwork [276]

Answer:

Explanation:

Several years ago we had the good fortune to ask the renowned activist artist Hans Haacke a

question:

How can you know when what you’ve done works?

He thought for a moment, and then replied,

I’ve been asked that question many times, and that question requires one to go around it

before one really avoids it.

Haacke’s response was meant to be humorous, but beneath it lay a serious problem: a general

aversion to conceptualizing the relationship between art, activism and social change. To be fair,

on the spectrum of artistic activism Haacke’s place is more toward the pole of the artist, and thus

his refusal to be pinned down by such a question merely conforms to the modern tradition that

valorizes art’s autonomy from society. Yet, even as we slide down the scale from expressive

artist to the more instrumental activist, the answer to the questions of how artistic activism works

to bring about social change and how to assess that impact remains elusive.1

This is a shaky foundation upon which to construct a rapidly growing field. Art schools have

devoted whole programs to the practice of arts and activism. Since Portland State University

launched the first of such programs, Art & Social Practice in 2007, the School of Visual Arts in

New York has added a department of Art Practice; CalArts: Social Practice & Public Forms; and

Queens College: Art & Social Action. New York University has two graduate programs devoted

to the intersection of arts and activism: Arts Politics in its performing arts school, and Art,

Education and Community Practice in its school of education and fine arts. Regardless of

program and department, university courses on arts and politics abound. In the Fall of 2010

alone, NYU offered over twenty courses, across four schools and colleges, exploring the

interconnections between arts, politics and social activism. This academic interest has prompted

a slew of recent books on arts and activism, with a cursory search on Amazon.com under “art

and activism” returning a staggering 1,345 results.

Museums curate entire exhibitions around the practice. In recent years, in New York City alone,

the Brooklyn Museum staged their monumental AgitProp show, the Whitney Museum, offered

up An Incomplete History Of Protest, and the Museum of the City of New York hosted AIDS at

Home, Art and Everyday Activism. Over the past decade, the Queens Museum has centered their

curatorial and educational mission around socially engaged arts, while Creative Time, the

1

“Artistic Activism,” a term first popularized in scholarship by Chantal Mouffe and in the field by the Center for

Artistic Activism, goes by many names: political art, creative activism, activist art, artivism socially engaged arts,

social practice arts, community based arts, artivism, arte útil, etc., each with slightly different emphases, and a

different place on the art/activism spectrum. What unites them all is the mobilization of both affect and effect.

2

ambitious NYC-based arts institution, organizes yearly “summits” which bring together artistic

activists from around the world. Around the world, from the Disobedient Objects show at the

Victoria and Albert Museum in London to The Art of Disruptions at Iziko South African

National Gallery, arts and activism has become an integral part of the arts scene. No global

Biennale is complete these days without its “social interventions” and the requisite controversy

surrounding the place of activism in the art world.

More important than academic and artistic institutions, however, is the attention turned to the

artistic activism by NGOs and philanthropic funders. Large organizations like the Open Society

Foundations have created new programs like the Arts Exchange to integrate arts into all levels of

their social programming, and smaller foundations like A Blade of Grass, Compton,

Rauschenberg, Surdna, et al. have made the support of arts and activism central to their mission.

Research groups like Americans for the Art’s Animating Democracy, and The Culture Group

produce reports and user guides for a range of actors in the field. Training institutes like the

Center for Artistic Activism, Beautiful Trouble, The Yes Labs, Intelligent Mischief, Center for

Story-Based Strategies, Backbone Campaign, to list just a few US examples, work with activists

who aspire to create more like artists and artists who would like to strategize more like activists.

But probably most critical of all is the attention paid to the practice by activists themselves. It is

now common in global activist NGOs like Greenpeace to local grassroots groups working on

immigration reform such as the New Sanctuary Coalition in NYC to develop “creative

strategies” alongside more traditional legal, electoral and mobilization approaches

5 0
3 years ago
Beans, corn and squash are the three???
Zinaida [17]
Theyre reffered to as the three sisters, bc they all work in harmony. I hope you found this answer helpful, and if so, please mark as brainliest, thank you ((P:
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • With the passing of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the U.S.Constitution, discrimination stopped legally but continued so
    8·2 answers
  • Elizabeth the I was the Protestant ruler of France.
    8·1 answer
  • One who speaks for or on behalf of others is a:
    7·1 answer
  • Im learning aout Florida's Land and Climate
    6·1 answer
  • Which line of longitude is closest to the pro football hallof fame in canton
    6·1 answer
  • In _____ conditioning, the unconditioned stimulus unconditionally elicits a reaction. For example, a bit of black pepper blown i
    7·1 answer
  • What will you do in this situation​
    7·1 answer
  • Which list shows forms or systems of government from the least power for the people to the most?
    14·2 answers
  • native Americans were forced to move west from.the ancestral homeland. where were the natives moved onto???​
    7·1 answer
  • What is the term for a group of people who share a common language, culture, or history?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!