1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Illusion [34]
3 years ago
14

FIRST TO ANSWER GET BRAINLIEST WHEN POSSIBLE!!!!!!

History
2 answers:
olga nikolaevna [1]3 years ago
4 0
1) traders might be attacked by other civilizations and looters
2) They may disagree upon the pricing and the worth of traded items
3) One may want to get rid of a item, another may not want to buy it, resulting in hatred and eventually war if it becomes too 'aggressive' 

hope this helps
lilavasa [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

According to research, there is very little known about merchants or traders during the Vedic Age in India, except during the latter part of the period. After the collapse of the initial Indus Valley Civilization, around the 2nd millenium BCE, smaller semi-nomadic, and then settled groups of villages were established in certain regions of the northern part of the Indus Valley, thanks to the influx of Indo-Aryans.

One of the findings about these peoples, all coming from the Rigveda-Samhita, tells that because these settlements were self-sufficient in their agricultural lifestyles, there was very little to no trading. However, at some point between the middle period and later Vedic period, merchants began to emerge. Because this was not yet, during the first two stages, an established activity, there were two major drawbacks, mentioned in the Rigveda. The first, these were adventurous people who faced the wilds to trade in small goods, so they were literally facing wild animals during their journeys to trade. The second was, that, since there were no kingdoms yet established, but rather independent units, there was little to no protection for tradespeople, which meant, they were also at the mercy of robbers, and attacks by other tribes and people.

These are two of the most mentioned.

You might be interested in
In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the majority of European immigrants came to the United States from
Anit [1.1K]

The majority of European immigrants to the United States (US) arrived from "southern and eastern Europe" throughout the late nineteenth (19th) and early twentieth (20th) centuries.

<h3>Why did the European immigrants come to the United States?</h3>

The majority of European immigrants settled in rural areas of the United States.

In the years 2012–16, 45 percent of European immigrants lived in one of four states:

  • New York (15%)
  • California (14%)
  • Florida, and Illinois (both 12% and 8% each)

Los Angeles County in California, Kings County in New York, Cook County in Illinois, and Queens County in New York were the top four counties in terms of the European population.

These counties together accounted for almost 15% of Europeans in the United States.

Therefore, southern and eastern europe is the correct answer.

Check out the link below to learn more about European immigrants;

brainly.com/question/9950569

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
In the 1920s, how did manufacturers make products faster and more cheaply?
blsea [12.9K]
The correct answer you are looking for should be answer D. They adopted Hanry Fords manufacturing techniques
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A similarity between the Indian Subcontinent and the Palestinian Mandate post-World War II was that both regions:
olga nikolaevna [1]

One similarity between the Indian Subcontinent and the Palestinian Mandate after WWII was that both places were partitioned into two states along religious lines.

<h3>How was Indian similar to Palestine?</h3>

The British were forced to divide India along religious lines to prevent conflict and this led to the nations of Pakistan and India being formed.

Palestine was also divided along religious lines with Israel being for the Jews and Palestine for Arabs.

Find out more on the partitioning of India at brainly.com/question/505300.

#SPJ1

5 0
2 years ago
Thomas Jefferson supported:
dusya [7]
Strong states rights is the answer to the question
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did sadden Hussein use weapons of mass destruction against Kurdish people and shiite Muslims
DaniilM [7]

They didn't, they used gas which was against international law.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Janissaries were
    6·2 answers
  • Which concept was NOT a enlightenment idea that influenced the founders of the United States of America?
    9·2 answers
  • Labor unions accomplished what for the working man?
    10·2 answers
  • Under Franklin Roosevelt's Good Neighbor policy,
    13·1 answer
  • is there a way for me to find answer without using this website and faster tchnicaly im askng if there is a way for me to cheat
    10·1 answer
  • How do countries get the goods they cannot produce?
    6·2 answers
  • 3. What did ancient Greeks inherit from homer and then pass on to later civilizations? A. Democratic principles B. Epic poetry C
    7·2 answers
  • Who was an astronomer during the Renaissance? Raphael Niccolo Machiavelli Johannes Kepler Mansa Musa
    8·2 answers
  • What was essential to the factory system by increasing efficiency and lessening the cost of production?
    14·1 answer
  • Summarize the american revolution in 5-10 words. boil it down to its bare essentials.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!