All categories

3 years ago

FIRST TO ANSWER GET BRAINLIEST WHEN POSSIBLE!!!!!!

2 answers:

4 0

1) traders might be attacked by other civilizations and looters
2) They may disagree upon the pricing and the worth of traded items
3) One may want to get rid of a item, another may not want to buy it, resulting in hatred and eventually war if it becomes too 'aggressive'

hope this helps

lilavasa [31]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

According to research, there is very little known about merchants or traders during the Vedic Age in India, except during the latter part of the period. After the collapse of the initial Indus Valley Civilization, around the 2nd millenium BCE, smaller semi-nomadic, and then settled groups of villages were established in certain regions of the northern part of the Indus Valley, thanks to the influx of Indo-Aryans.

One of the findings about these peoples, all coming from the Rigveda-Samhita, tells that because these settlements were self-sufficient in their agricultural lifestyles, there was very little to no trading. However, at some point between the middle period and later Vedic period, merchants began to emerge. Because this was not yet, during the first two stages, an established activity, there were two major drawbacks, mentioned in the Rigveda. The first, these were adventurous people who faced the wilds to trade in small goods, so they were literally facing wild animals during their journeys to trade. The second was, that, since there were no kingdoms yet established, but rather independent units, there was little to no protection for tradespeople, which meant, they were also at the mercy of robbers, and attacks by other tribes and people.

These are two of the most mentioned.

You might be interested in

Why did President Roosevelt support the rebels in Panama when they declared independence from Colombia?

Mashcka [7]

He supported them because he wanted later to make a treaty with panama to construct the panama canal.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What internal and external factors contributed to the collapse of the roman and chinese empires.

labwork [276]

The internal and external factors that contributed to the collapse of the

Roman and Chinese empires were as follows:

Internal factors -

excessively expensive and overextended compared to the existing resources.
neither had technology advances that increased available resources.
Both were victims of tax avoidance by landowner families who absolved the poor from paying taxes.
Instability was brought on by antagonism between elite factions in both cases.
Both were affected by epidemics.

External factor -

Both empires' frontier territories were inhabited by nomadic nomads who grew to be increasingly dangerous and eventually captured parts of both empires.

<h3>Why did the Roman and Chinese empires collapse?</h3>

The fall of the Roman Empire had a number of causes. Each was woven into the other. Many people even attribute the rise of Christianity to the fall. Many Roman inhabitants became pacifists as a result of Christianity, making it harder to repel the barbarian invaders. Additionally, the Roman empire could have been maintained with the money invested to construct churches.

Han China's downfall was primarily brought on by the government's inability to run the country effectively. The bureaucrats became corrupt and prioritized pleasure over their jobs. The empire saw epidemics and nomadic insurgencies, yet government spending increased because political officials led extravagant lifestyles.

To learn more about the Roman and Chinese Empires visit:

brainly.com/question/19566447

#SPJ4

7 0

1 year ago

After the passage of the Twenty-sixth amendment, which group of citizens is automatically excluded from the right to vote

Galina-37 [17]

After the passage of the twenty-sixth amendment the group of citizens which are automatically excluded from the right to vote were people under the age of 18, so minors. The passage of the twenty-sixth amendment stated that people of the age of eighteen and over were allowed to vote, when previously only people of twenty-one and over were allowed to vote. This is in part because of the student activism due to the Vietnam War.

6 0

3 years ago

Why did Pericles' strategy fail

Alex Ar [27]

<span>The city grew overcrowded, promoted disease, disrupted supplies. The moral of soldiers also dropped significantly.</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What issue was specifically listed as becoming more and more prominen amongest women during the tme of progessivism?

zhenek [66]

Answer:

Women's suffrage

Explanation:

Progressive women became increasingly involved in activism with the goal of acquiring equal voting rights. Women only got the right to vote in the U.S. in 1920, thanks to the 19th Amendment and the progressive movement.

In fact, the first wave of feminism is considered to be the movement that achieved the women's suffrage, and some of its most important leaders were Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucy Stone, and Ida B. Wells.

4 0

3 years ago