In his 2008 article for the New York Times, James Gleick talks about "the gloom that has fallen over the book-publishing industry" to describe the the negative impact of digitalizing books in the book-publishing industry.
In this article he describes the already decline in paper-books sales due to the rise of digital platforms such as Kindle, epub, etc, and how the future of book-publishers looked grimer because of an agreement between authors, publishers and Google to allow the scanning and digitalizing of books to make them accesible in website and digital platforms.
This agreement would be dramatic for the sectors of the book-publishing industry dealing with marketing, archiving and distributing physical paper books.
The answer to this would be the Commerce Clause. Hope this helps! :)
I believe it is D....
Hope this helps
Segregation had been considered constitutional under the lemma "separate but equal" during the Flessy vs. Ferguson case in 1896. The decision enacted by the US Supreme Court stated that the provision of rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the US Constitution was secured for every US kid, as long as the educational facilities were equal in terms of quality, no matter whether white and black children were separated or not.
Fortunately, the decision subsequently reached in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 overturned the previous convictions and decisions of the Supreme Court, arguing how separating children solely in terms of race would trigger feelings of inferiority and discrimination in US black kids ans this would, in turn, affect their school performance and hence, it declared segregation to be unconstitutional and urged schools to remove such system.
