He said he was angry at you last night
An Appellate Court is not (usually) the Court of original jurisdiction. So, in many cases you would start at a Federal Trial Court (District Court) and would have a normal trial. If you lost, you could appeal to the Appellate Court, who would review the record (only) from the Trial Court for clear error, bias, etc. A new trial does not occur at the Appellate Level, unless it is a court of original jurisdiction.
Answer:
What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?
Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.
What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?
The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.
Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.
A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.
The correct answer is: Absolute power.
The teachings of Confusio are based on good conduct in life, good government of the State, care for tradition, study and meditation.
He affirmed that if a ruler is virtuous, the subjects will imitate his example, therefore, the maximum virtues of a ruler are: tolerance, kindness, benevolence, love of neighbor and respect for elders and ancestors.
Answer:
The decolonization of West African countries
Explanation:
