Hey there!
I assume we're talking about Animal Farm.
First of all, this statement alludes to the fact that they're trying to say that animals are good, and humans are bad- because that's the main idea in most parts of the book. The animals have risen up and created their own rules for the farm in the wake of the human oppression previously not occurring and brought to life by the speech of Old Major. There are two main problems:
First of all, the whole farm runs on animals - however, pigs remain sovereign. The problem is, although most animals do have four legs, some animals, like swans, birds, and chickens, don't. That means they're left out and perhaps their contribution to the farm can be lost as a result of the fact that their physical anatomy betrays the ideals of the Commandments.
Secondly, we discussed before how this leaves out humans. However, they need humans- especially for the windmill at the beginning. If you remember, Napoleon actually had to make deals with some, and those proved to be very beneficial. This pretty much means that Napoleon is trying to dictate the beliefs of the beings he rules, but breaks and bends his own rules when he wants. After all, he became the leader after a revolution on the farm and uses his attack dogs in place of military force. Sound familiar? Napoleon represents Joseph Stalin, and most other characters represent people from history. One of the main points of this book is looking at it from another perspective. The animals mean something, it's more a book about the actions of people.
Hope this helps!
The details from the excerpts that best support the author’s purpose is option D which is In the first excerpt, the author uses narrative techniques and figurative language, while in the second excerpt, the author includes facts to persuade.
<h3>What is an excerpt?</h3>
An excerpt refer to words, phrases or sentences that is deduced or is extracted from a paragraph in a passage or an article which has meaning. From the two excerpts, the author talked about challenges abandoned or children faced on their own without their parents.
Therefore, The details from the excerpts that best support the author’s purpose is option D which is In the first excerpt, the author uses narrative techniques and figurative language, while in the second excerpt, the author includes facts to persuade.
The question is incomplete, below is the completed part gotten from brainly website.
How do details from the excerpts support the author’s purpose?
- In the first excerpt, the author uses facts and statistics, while in the second excerpt, the author uses words that appeal to readers’ emotions.
- In the first excerpt, the author relies on third-person point of view, while in the second excerpt, the author uses first-person point of view.
- In the first excerpt, the author uses words to persuade the reader, while in the second excerpt, the author uses language to entertain the reader.
- In the first excerpt, the author uses narrative techniques and figurative language, while in the second excerpt, the author includes facts to persuade.
Learn more about excerpt below.
brainly.com/question/21400963
#SPJ1
Answer:
1 - A, 2 - A,, 3 - C, 4 - D ,, 5 - C Explanation:
ill answer more but thats the first 5 :)
I think a person just knows when it is the right time to end a friendship, they should know when the friendship can no longer continue, and a person should leave a friendship based on what type of emotions come from the friendships and a person should always care about they’re well-being first it’s not selfish it’s self care.
