It really depends on the time period, but if we're talking in general, China had Confucian views, while India had the caste system. Both were very patriarchal, but China's social system was more based on family values and India was more focused on jobs. China was way more strict ("women should stay in the house", foot binding, etc.) I hope this helps somewhat. :)
Answer:
See Explanation
Explanation:
Louis XIV reigned as king of France between 1643 to 1715. He was a strong king who brought the French monarchy to limelight all round Europe. In his time, France also made significant progress in the area of culture and art. He was known as the "sun king".
His positive legacies include the fact that he brought the French monarchy into prominence in Europe, made France a citadel of culture and art in Europe and he was a renowned military leader with a lot of colonies under him.
His negative legacies include the fact that he made the French kingdom to become heavily indebted and he increased taxes of the common people which eventually led to the French revolution.
Answer:
Leaders often seize power by illegitimate means.
A single leader or a very powerful group rules.
Leaders refuse to tolerate dissenting views.
Explanation:
Authoritarian government is the form of government in which one member holds the authority of taking the decisions and its implementation. The participatory role of any other member is restricted in this form of government. The sole authority lies in the single hand. Individual freedom is not given space and the actions and thoughts of the citizens are monitored as per the government rules and guidelines.
Answer:
Buddhism and Taoism are both very peaceful religions and use meditation for peace of mind and enlightenment. Both religions focus on a goal of self-improvement. Buddhists believe in reincarnation, which is the belief in cyclic life after death. Taoists believe in the here and now more than what happens after death.
Explanation: This is my 10th time helping you♡.
Answer:
To create public sympathy for wartime opponents.
Explanation:
Wartime propaganda can be defined as ideas, informations, allegations, or facts that are spread deliberately and methodically by a party, so as to demoralize, confuse and further it's cause against the enemy.
This ultimately implies that, wartime propaganda is focused on annihilating the will of an opponent to continue fighting in a war by ensuring that their morale is demoralized and broken down.
Hence, creating public sympathy for wartime opponents was not a purpose of wartime propaganda.
