Answer:
C. Ron’s basis in his stock is $27,000
Explanation:
Income recognized on services rendered $21,000
Add basis of $6,000
Ron stock basis $27,000
The property contributed by Ron is not considered insignificant compared to the value of the services he has rendered, which is why the entire contribution is counted as being for property.
Hence, the control requirement is satisfied and a valid § 351 transaction results. Ron’s stock basis is $27,000 [$6,000 (basis of cattle transferred) + $21,000 (income recognized on services rendered)]
Answer:
1. $70
2. $106.42
Explanation:
(1) Variable manufacturing cost per unit:
= Direct labor + Direct material + Variable overhead
= $10 + $34 + $26
= $70
(2) Full cost per unit:
= Direct labor + Direct material + Variable overhead + Variable selling cost + (Fixed ÷ 1,200)
= $10 + $34 + $26 + $5 + [(19,500 + 18,200) ÷ 1,200)]
= $75 + $31.42
= $106.42
Answer:
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
Explanation:
Is necessary to consider different amount of suppliers and evaluate the cost. We will choose the number of suppliers which offers a lower cost.
- EMV1 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk + cost of managing supplier = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05+16000 = 9600 + 24000 + 16000 = $ 49600
- EMV2 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk of each supplier*unique event risk of each supplier + cost of managing 2 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 1200 + 16000*2 = $ 42800
- EMV3 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of managing 3 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 16000*3 = $ 57600
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
Answer and Explanation:
In the case when the budget balance of the Conania varies i.e. from positive to negative so the capital inflow would decrease
Now this impact private investment spending in such a way that the situation would become worst and this would lead a serious crowding effect that ultimately reduce the economy
Hence, the same is relevant
