Answer:
4 million houses
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is the forfeited benefit as a result of choosing one option over others. Its value equals the cost of the next best alternative.
The cost of constructing a new home is $150,000. If the Federal Defence has a budget of $600 billion, the opportunity cost of spending that amount will be the equivalent number of units that can be built by the amount.
To calculate the number of units= $600 billion divided by $150,000
= $600,000,000,000/ $150,000
=4,000,000
=4 million units
Available Options Are:
A. 401 units
B. 294 units
C. 441 units
D. 305 units
Answer:
Option C. 441 Units
Explanation:
The first thing would be to analyze the situation. It is crystal clear in the Accessibility Elite table that the accessibility of Digby products are 2nd largest among the rival companies.
Now we will look at whether the company has taken advantage of its second largest accessibility position or not. This can be seen in Actual Vs Potential Market Share table. The units produced were sold in the year which means that the accessibility of the product is even more than its rivals as the market share captured in the year by Digby is above 40%. This means that their is an increased demand for Digby's Product. This can also be seen by segment growth rate in the Elite Statistics (Top Left Corner) which is anticipated to be at 16%.
All these things says that Digby must produce as much as possible, hence quantity would be a greater number.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of composite score for each location is shown below:-
Composite score for A is
= 0.15 × 89 + .20 × 75 + 0.18 × 92 + 0.27 × 92 + 0.10 × 93 + 0.10 × 90
= 88.05
Composite score for B is
= 0.15 × 78 + .20 × 93 + 0.18 × 90 + 0.27 × 93 + 0.10 × 97 + 0.10 × 96
= 90.91
Composite score for C is
= 0.15 × 84 + .20 × 98 + 0.18 × 87 + 0.27 × 82 + 0.10 × 84 + 0.10 × 95
= 87.90
Therefore for computing the composite score for each location we simply multiply weight with A location and in the same manner of A, B and C
b. The maximum composite score from A, B and C is B
Answer:
Direct Material Price Variance = $300 Favorable
Explanation:
Direct Material Price Variance = (Standard Price - Actual Price)
Actual Quantity
Standard Price = $4 per pound
Actual Price =
= 
Since the actual price is less than the standard price the variance will be favorable as the amount paid for actual use is less then the estimated standard cost.
Thus, direct material price variance = ($4 - $3.8)
1,500
= $300 Favorable
Steve owns a bike store, his total costs are $1.2 million per year. Last year, Steve sold 1,200 bikes. Steve's average total cost was $1,000 per bike.
To solve: take the total costs of $1.2 million and divide it by the number of bikes sold, $1,200
Average total cost = 1,200,000/1,200
Average total cost = $1,000