1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kodGreya [7K]
3 years ago
12

For the years 1880 to 1925, analyze both the tensions surrounding the issue of immigration and the United States government’s re

sponse to these tensions. Use the following documents and your knowledge of the period from 1880 to 1925.
History
1 answer:
nasty-shy [4]3 years ago
7 0
Now, the primary source of contention regarding immigration is that people fear their jobs will be taken away from them. Back then, the concern was that many of the immigrants were Catholic, which upset the political elite of Protestants.
You might be interested in
Why did New Mexico, Texas, and California attract expansionists in the 1820s?
ankoles [38]

They had massive oil reserves

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How old was the United States in 1801
stira [4]
I’m pretty sure the answer is 1801? but good luck
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What type of representation would the states have under the Virginia plan
sp2606 [1]
<span> The Virginia Plan wanted representation proportional to the population of the state. It proposed a bicameral legislature (I think. Don't remember. It's been a long time!) in which states got seats in both houses based on how large their population was.

The way it's easy to remember is that Virginia was the biggest state in the country at the time, so naturally they thought the state with the biggest population should have the most votes! </span>
4 0
4 years ago
It ensures individual liberty and social enrichment called what?​
levacccp [35]

Answer:

Freedom is necessary to generate progress; people also value freedom as an important

component of progress. This chapter will contend that both propositions are correct. Without

liberty, there will be little or no progress; most people will consider an expansion in freedom as

progress. Neither proposition would win universal acceptance. Some would argue that a

totalitarian state can marshal the resources to generate economic growth. Many will contend that

too much liberty induces libertine behavior and is destructive of society, peace, and the family.

For better or worse, the record shows that freedom has increased throughout the world

over the last few centuries and especially over the last few decades. There are of course many

examples of non-free, totalitarian, ruthless government on the globe, but their number has

decreased and now represents a smaller proportion of the world’s population. Perhaps this growth

of freedom is partially responsible for the breakdown of the family and the rise in crime, described

in the previous chapter. Dictators do tolerate less crime and are often very repressive of deviant

sexual behavior, but, as the previous chapter reported, divorce and illegitimacy are more connected

with improved income of women than with a permissive society. Moreover, the ability to rid

oneself of a objectionable mate improves the well-being of the adults involved and may leave the

children no worse than if they had been raised by two antagonistic parents.

A police state can also repress much crime, although no government can totally rid society

of lawlessness. Democracies can also take vigorous action against crime, but protecting the

innocent from government intrusion hampers the effectiveness of law enforcement. The state can

make two types of errors: they can arrest, prosecute and convict and innocent individual or they

can fail to arrest, prosecute or convict a guilty one. Repressive dictators typically are more willing

to make the first type of error and allow the innocent to be caught up with the guilty. Elected

6 0
3 years ago
What challenges did Cleopatra face?
Stolb23 [73]
To tell the truth she did not face a great deal of "hardships" but had to deal with some important problems. She had married her little brother,whom she wanted out of the way and found the occasion to do so through her relationship with Caesar. When he was killed she was faced with the problem of keeping Egypt independent and herself on the throne,she once again managed to do so by her love-affair with Marc Anthony. When they lost the battle against Octavian and her lover committed suicide,she knew it was over and preferred to kill herself before being dragged by Octavian in his Triumph procession in Rome. 
<span>She lived in luxury, was powerful,intelligent and attractive. Was loved by two of the most powerfull man of her time. I would not say that she had a very hard life,only her end was tragic.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Select three events from the list of five given below - one showing isolationism, one showing intervention, and one showing impe
    13·1 answer
  • Which options accurately describe the role of Moses in the Bible?
    8·2 answers
  • African American voters outnumbered white voters in several states, including
    15·2 answers
  • The Jamestown settlers made a profitfor their investors by rasing this
    15·1 answer
  • How many total presidents in the U.S.A​
    13·1 answer
  • Which statement about the Neolithic Revolution
    8·1 answer
  • When was riverside California was made
    11·1 answer
  • What strategies and techniques did the feminist movement adopt from the civil rights movement?
    15·2 answers
  • Why is following the Eightfold Path so important in Buddhism?
    7·1 answer
  • Easy points , hugs !!!!!
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!