Delegating power from Congress to the Presidency does not endanger the principle of separation of power neccesarily, but it does increases the power of the President. Depending on what powers are delegated to the presidency, then there could be a danger of breaking the principle of separation of power. Therefore, in some cases delegating power in the presidency could make it too powerful.
True or false: it is true
basically all of those kingdoms are all different classification levels
and the last part would be A and B
Answer:
D
note: Chào bạn, đây là web dùng chung cho cả thế giới vì vậy cho nên bạn nên sử dụng tiếng anh để hỏi thì sẽ có nhiều câu trả lời để bạn tham khảo hơn. Mới đầu mình sử dụng cũng bị các bạn nước ngoài nhắc nhở á. Nếu bạn không phiền thì sau này có câu hỏi gì thì cứ nhắn tin và hỏi mình nha, tại mình thấy người Việt sử dụng web này cũng ít á. ok Chào bạn nhé!
Explanation:
<span>Italy faced unemployment, a decline in trade, rising taxes, and a weak and divided government. Not to mention whose side to take in WWII.
Hope this helps!</span>
Absolutism is the political regime that is characterized by the meeting of all powers in a single person. These political regimens are more commonly seen in monarchies and as such the French monarchy was no different.
Louis XIV was the best example of an absolute ruler, his infamous quote "I am the state" was statement that came from the steps it took to make it possible for him to rule unquestioned.
These included:
- Subjugating the noble class
- Creation of a bureaucratic state
- Collecting taxes for the crown
- A loyal and large army
- Religious uniformity (Henry IV converted to catholicism in order to rule the largely catholic predominant country)
All these steps and policies along with help from Richelieu (eliminating domestic factions and restraining the power of the nobility), Mazarin (advocating the divine right of kings) and Colbert (raising taxes and tariffs to aid the State treasury of France) made it possible for the consolidation of the French monarchy in the 17th century.