Answer:
I think the answer is the first one.
Explanation:
We are looking for the answer that doesn't illustrate how WWII was a total war. Well, the third one is not the answer because it is right. WWII was a total war because of the fact that almost all resources from the nations involved were devoted to the war effort. The fourth one is not the answer because WWII was a global conflict that engulfed many countries. The second one is also not the answer because propaganda was used to increase support for the war and commitment to an Allied victory.
... frustrations with how independence had led to situations where caudillos (authoritarian leaders) rose to power.
Bolivar had wanted a united Spanish America, a great nations, but the wars of independence had tended to result in charismatic military rulers leading their own countries in authoritarian ways -- what we today would call dictators.
They where merchants, artisans, professionals suck as lawyers or doctors, and <span>government officials.</span>
The naval battle which fully crippled the Japanese Navy as an effective force against the vast US forces. With the untimely death of Admiral Yamamoto, this naval battle greatly turned the tides of War for the allied forces on the Asian Pacific naval front. Japanese air coverage was greatly reduced (3 aircraft carriers were sunk), and later during the <span>Battle of Leyte Gulf, greatly reduced the ability of the Japanese to stop the American led counteroffensive and "island hopping" strategy.</span>
The crusades led to the increase in trade and seeking of new trade routes for Europe.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The influence and the effect of the crusade on Europe was both negative also and it was positive also. The positive impact of the crusades was that it led to the increase of the trade and led to the growth and development in Europe with the expansion of their market.
The negative impact of the crusades on Europe was the religious polarization in the area of Europe.
