Based on the graph, what are the solutions of the equation
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
To figure out if a point works with it's equation, you should replace the x and y with the point you got
-8 > 3(-5)+6
-8 > -15 +6
-8 > -9
Since -8 is bigger than -9, point (-5,-8) is true to the equation.
and as seen in the graph I have attached, the point does infact reside in the shaded in area. If you haven't learned how to graph this type of equation, you may disregard the graph :)
If you have any questions at all, don't be afraid to ask :)
Answer:
The null hypothesis is .
The alternate hypothesis is
The pvalue of the test is 0.0182 < 0.05, which means that there is sufficient evidence to show that the manufacturer needs to recalibrate the machines.
Step-by-step explanation:
A manufacturer must test that his bolts are 4.00 cm long when they come off the assembly line.
This means that the null hypothesis is that they are 4.00 cm long, that is:
At the alternate hypothesis we test if it is different. So
The test statistic is:
In which X is the sample mean, is the value tested at the null hypothesis,
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
4 is tested at the null hypothesis:
This means that
After sampling 196 randomly selected bolts off the assembly line, he calculates the sample mean to be 4.14 cm.
This means that
He knows that the population standard deviation is 0.83 cm.
This means that
Value of the test statistic:
Pvalue of the test and decision:
The pvalue of the test is the probability that the sample mean is different by at least 4.14 - 4 = 0.14 from the target value, which is P(|z| > 2.36), which is 2 multiplied by the pvalue of z = -2.36.
Looking at the z-table, z = -2.36 has a pvalue of 0.0091
2*0.0091 = 0.0182
The pvalue of the test is 0.0182 < 0.05, which means that there is sufficient evidence to show that the manufacturer needs to recalibrate the machines.