If the price of product x rises, then the resulting decline in the amount purchased will<u> increase the marginal utility of this good.</u>
The difference in overall utility that results from consuming one extra unit of a good is known as marginal utility. Economists utilize the idea of marginal utility to estimate the quantity of a good that consumers will buy.
When the overall utility is increased by the consumption of an additional item, positive marginal utility occurs. On the other side, negative marginal utility arises when the overall utility is reduced by the consumption of one extra unit. Progressive taxation are frequently defended using the law of diminishing marginal utility.
Negative, zero, or positive marginal utility are all possible.
Hence, option B is the correct answer
To learn more about marginal utility here,
brainly.com/question/15561406
#SPJ4
Answer:
$76.5 million
Explanation:
For computing the EBIT, first we have to do the following calculations
Free cash flow = Operating cash flow – Investment in operating capital
$39.1 million = Operating cash flow -$ 22.1million
So, operating cash flow is
= $39.1 million + $22.1 million
= $61.20 million
Now
Operating cash flow = EBIT – Taxes on EBIT + Depreciation expenses
$61.2 million = EBIT- $28.9 million + $13.6 million
So, the EBIT is
= $61.2 million + $28.9 million - $13.6 million
= $76.5 million
Answer:
Purchase farms
Explanation:
The Farm Security Administration (FSA) was a New Deal agency created in 1937 to combat rural poverty during the Great Depression in the United States.
The FSA stressed "rural rehabilitation" efforts to improve the lifestyle of very poor landowning farmers, and a program to purchase submarginal land owned by poor farmers and resettle them in group farms on land more suitable for efficient farming.
The FSA resettled poor farmers on more productive land, promoted soil conservation, provided emergency relief and loaned money to help fanners buy and improve farms. It built experimental rural communities, suburban "Greenbelt towns" and sanitary camps for migrant farmworkers.
The blurring of the lines separating the subsets of the financial industry started in the <span>1990s. The blurring
of the lines that separate the subsets of the financial industry was initiated
in the 1990s under the regime of the president of the US, Bill Clinton. At the time,
the financial products were mainly loans, payment services, deposits, savings,
and fiduciary services. </span>
