When resources are low, businesses know that they can increase their prices because people need them desperately.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Interest expense A/c Dr $3,000
To Interest payable A/c $3,000
(Being interest is recorded)
The computation of the interest expense is shown below:
= Principal × rate of interest × number of months ÷ total number of months in a year
= $125,000 × 6% × (4 months ÷ 12 months)
= $2,500
The four-month is calculated from the September 1 to December 31
Answer:
a. Karen Meyer's personal records
c. American red cross
Explanation:
The $6,000 contribution should be recorded in Karen Meyer's personal records because 1) the donation was made on her personal name 2) a donation of such size is relevant when Karen files her taxes.
The contribution should also be recorded in the American red cross records because the organization needs to clarify to the tax authorities where each sum of money it obtains comes from.
Answer:
The best recommendation to be made to this client is to do nothing.
Explanation:
Investment in stock is a highly risky investment because price of stock often fluctuates which can make an investor to lose a lot of money.
From the question, the client is already old at age 67 with a low income and he does not have any other liquid assets apart from the annual income of $25,000, mainly from social security and interest on funds held in a bank savings account.
Since losing so much money through investment in stock is not affordable to him, the best recommendation to be made to this client is to that he should do nothing.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the given case it is valid contract as there is time, promise, benefit and obligation to do thing. But verbal contracts are difficult to prove. Stan and Byron have a verbal contract which is a promise for 10 days and the contract has exchange of goods for $600. Offer is made by Byron but the acceptance is not yet given by Stan.
Here only the offer is made and it is not yet accepted by Byron. here Stan has revoked the offer through letter so the revoke has been communicated to the other party through letter. So in this case there is no breach of contract as the contract was clearly revoked by Stan through his letter.
