9.
1 answer:
Using <span>Compound interest formula:
</span>
<span><span>The exponential function for calculating the amount of money after <span>t <span>years, <span>A<span>(<span>t<span>), where<span> P <span>is the initial amount or principal, the annual interest rate is <span>r <span>and the number of times<span> interest is compounded per year is <span>n, is given by</span>
</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>
</span><span>from the given information:
p = 1,380 , r = 0.05 , t =3 and </span><span>compounded daily ⇒⇒⇒ n =365
Amount after 3 years = </span>
<span>
= 1,603.315
</span>
</span>
<span><span>The exponential function for calculating the amount of money after <span>t <span>years, <span>A<span>(<span>t<span>), where<span> P <span>is the initial amount or principal, the annual interest rate is <span>r <span>and the number of times<span> interest is compounded per year is <span>n, is given by</span>
</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span>
</span><span>from the given information:
p = 1,380 , r = 0.05 , t =3 and </span><span>compounded daily ⇒⇒⇒ n =365
Amount after 3 years = </span>
<span>
</span>
You might be interested in
Answer:
Where is the question? Did you forget to attach the image, or did you need to create several possibilities?
Step-by-step explanation:
If you wanted several possibilities:
Answer:
If we compare the p value and using the significance level given we have
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion is not significantly different from 0.77.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Data given and notation
n=500 represent the random sample taken
X=380 represent the number of people with some characteristic
estimated proportion of adults that said that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax returns
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
Confidence=95% or 0.95
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value (variable of interest)
2) Concepts and formulas to use
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is 0.7 .:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
(1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion is significantly different from a hypothesized value
.
<em>Check for the assumptions that he sample must satisfy in order to apply the test </em>
a)The random sample needs to be representative: On this case the problem no mention about it but we can assume it.
b) The sample needs to be large enough
3) Calculate the statistic
Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:
4) Statistical decision
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level provided . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.
Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:
If we compare the p value and using the significance level given we have
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion is not significantly different from 0.77.