Answer:
Only B
Step-by-step explanation:
As it says in the graph, the situation we're dealing with are hours to meters. So, A would not be the correct answer. B shows proper use of both hours and meters with the right values. C is incorrect because the answer is B.
Answer:
2.174 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the number of hours be represented as:
x
The price of Stock A at 9 A.M. was $12.79 Since then, the price has been increasing at the rate of $0.11 each hour.
$12.79 + $0.11 × x
12.79 + 0.11x
At noon the price of Stock B was $13.29 It begins to decrease at the rate of $0.12 each hour.
$13.29 - $0.12× x
13.29 - 0.12x
Equating both equations together
Stock A = Stock B
12.79 + 0.11x = 13.29 - 0.12x
Collecting like terms
0.11x + 0.12x = 13.29 - 12.79
0.23x = 0.5
x = 0.5/0.23
x = 2.1739130435 hours
x = Approximately = 2.174 hours
If the two rates continue, the number of hours that the prices of the two stocks will be the same is 2.174 hours
Answer:
6.43
pls follow me and mark brainliest ...thank u
Step-by-step explanation:
length of side x will be
Tan tita = opp/adjacent
tan65 = x/3
tan 65 is 2.14
so...you are left with 2.14=x/3
by cross multiplying
x= 2.14 × 3
= 6.43
Answer:
4y-12
Step-by-step explanation:
To multiply a sum (or difference) by a factor, each summand (or minuend and subtrahend) is multiplied by this factor and the resulting products are added (or subtracted).
If the operation outside the parentheses (in this case, the multiplication) is commutative, then left-distributivity implies right-distributivity and vice versa, and one talks simply of distributivity.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The first step in solving the equation is to cube both sides:
(∛x)³ = (-4)³ . . . . . = (-4)(-4)(-4) = 16(-4) = -64
x = -64 . . . . . simplified
__
We're not sure what "checking" is supposed to involve here. Usually, one would check the answer by seeing if a true statement is made when the answer is put into the original equation.
∛(-64) = -4 . . . true
Many calculators will not compute √(-64) because they compute roots using logarithms. The log of a negative number is not defined.
So, the way one would check this is to cube both sides, which is how we got the answer in the first place. We expect the same result from doing the same operation again, so it isn't really a check.
