$1000 coupons for coupons ignore liquidity premium bond you’re so mature healed to maturity a temperature of a tree family ancient mayonnaise
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Care means meeting the needs of ourselves and others. Ethics of care involves practising virtues as it maintain relationship and promote the well-being of those who give and receive care in social relations. It is hinged on the theory of what makes an action right or wrong.
Ideally, ethics of care is inspired to take care of the less privilege, the dependants and vulnerable. It place relevance on relationships, responsibility, concern over traditional rule. Ethics of care recognize that human relationships are not similar or do not perfectly match up hence incorporate this fact into the view and claiming that moral duty is partially determined by how vulnerable a person is in a relationship.
While ethics of care seems to place emphasis on social well being of vulnerable, yet it has being a foremost part of ethical issues among professionals such as medical practitioners.
Answer:
- finding the type of employees that would help them execute its growth and specialization strategies
- retaining the employees after hiring them
Explanation:
Some of the staffing issues would create the biggest obstacles to Starbucks ability to execute its growth and specialization strategies is finding the type of employees that would help them execute its growth and specialization strategies this because employees with such special skills are either hired already or Starbucks would have to fight off stiff competition for such employee
another staffing issue that would create an obstacle for Starbucks is retaining the employees after hiring them and one way to overcome this is good welfare packages and good working environment
I would guess be good at sports or be popular because in 4th and 5th grade there are no grades
Answer:
C) a positive result from regulatory and economic environmental forces.
Explanation:
In the short run the whole economy will benefit, more American jobs will be created, consumers will probably get good cars at even lower prices, but on the long run the scenario may not be that good for everyone. If Toyota builds the plant, it will be the result of economic and political pressures, and that is a game that two can play, just ask farmers about the trade deal with China.
On the other hand, this is a type of deja vu (or been there, done that), and it ended up with GM and Chrysler bankrupt and Ford barely surviving. This types of policies were enforced in the 1980s by president Reagan and the famous "Made in the USA" by Bruce Springsteen. Back then Honda had a small factory and Toyota was starting to consider building a plant in the US, Nissan hadn't showed up yet. Fast forward a few years and the only good American vehicles are pickups, the Japanese brands wiped out the rest. The country is full of Camrys, Accords, Civics, Corollas, CRVs and Rav4s. They are great cars, too great for the American car manufacturers to compete against. Who knows, with this type of policies maybe in 10 years the only American car manufacturer left will be Tesla.
This is like playing with fire on top of a fuel truck.