50 x 50= 2500 would work out, anything else is lower
Hey!
Using the additive property of equality, we can subtract 5x from both sides to get 5x^2-9x=1. Next, we can subtract 1 from both sides to get 5x^2-9x-1=0. Thus, we have a polynomial equation of the form ax^2+bx+c. To simplify this, we would need to factor it out. In the case where a>1, which this one is, we must factor the polynomial so we end up with (5x+ _)(x+_). Thus, if we put the first blank as the value a and the second value as the value b, we get (5x+a)*(x+b)=5x^2+ax+5xb+ab. Thus, a*b=-1 (since there isn’t an x attached to it) and ax+5xb=-9x. Using a*b=-1, we can divide b from both sides using the multiplicative property of equality to get a=-1/b. Substituting that into ax+5xb=-9x, we have ax+5(-1/a)x=-9x. Dividing x from both sides, we get a+-5/a=-9. Multiplying both sides by a get rid of the -5/a, we get a^2-5=-9a. Adding 9a to both sides, we end up with a^2+9a-5=0. This is simpler than our original equation, and we can quickly figure out that because (0)^2+9*0-5=-5 and (1)^2+9*1-5=5, a must be between 0 and 1 and it would therefore be relatively complex to factor out. Therefore, our equation stays as is, and our simplified equation is 5x^2-9x-1=0
Feel free to ask further questions, and have a great day!
Answer:
The middle option.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because the points on each triangle are equidistant from the imaginary line in between the two triangles. It isn't the first option because that is a rotation, and it isn't the third right option because that is a translation.
Please mark for Brainliest!! :D Thanks!!
For more information or questions, please comment below and I'll respond ASAP.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The given expression is

We will rewrite the expression

When we add the fraction
=
= 8
While Andre says the answer is 
because Andre added the denominator where he has to make a common denominator that should be 4 instead of 8.
Andre made mistake in this step
Picture is given below :
Answer:
The correct option is c which is if this test was one-tailed instead of two-tailed, you would reject the null.
Step-by-step explanation:
a: This statement cannot be true as the p-value for a 1 tailed test is dependent on the level of significance and other features.
b: This statement cannot be true as there is no valid mathematical correlation between the p-value of the one-tailed test and the current p-value.
c: This statement is true because due to the enhanced level of significance, the null hypothesis will not be rejected.
d: This statement is inverse of statement c which cannot be true.
e: The statement cannot be true as there is no correlation between the current p-value and the p-value of 1 tailed test. The correlation exists between the values of one-tailed and two-tailed p-values.