Answer:
The tall of the flag pole is 51 ft answer (A)
Step-by-step explanation:
∵ The tall of the man = 6 ft
∵ The his shadow = 10 ft
∵ The shadow of the flag pole = 85 ft
∵ Tall of the man/tall of the flag = shadow of the man/shadow
of the flag
∴ 6/x = 10/85 ⇒ where x is the tall of the flag
∴ x = (6 × 85) ÷ 10 = 510 ÷ 10 = 51 ft
∴ The tall of the flag pole is 51 ft
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3000 600
5000 1000
6000 1200
7500 1500
No it doesn't form a proportional relationship because yes, the ratio is constant AFTER the 5,000, you do need to hit the 5,000 first, and then it changes. So no, it's not proportional because it isn't constant throughout the entirety of the relationship. If you're just going based on the table in question, then yes it will be proportional since it doesn't have the 5,000 in it but if you're looking at it in it's entirety, no it's not.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
this is because we don't know how many trainers she goes to, so the cost will be 35p. and then include the registration fees she pays.
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
The maximum amount Eric can spend on magazines is $25 less the cost of lunch, $15.
The appropriate inequality sign would be less than since he cannot spend more than $25.
Also, the amount he can spend on magazines would be what is left after paying for lunch.
So the correct inequality is 4m - 15 < 25
